| #1 | CopenhagenDenmark | 91/100 | Overall composite 91/100; affordability 66, air 88, energy 94. |
|---|
| #2 | SingaporeSingapore | 90/100 | Overall composite 90/100; affordability 60, air 80, energy 85. |
|---|
| #3 | ZurichSwitzerland | 90/100 | Overall composite 90/100; affordability 52, air 88, energy 92. |
|---|
| #4 | StockholmSweden | 90/100 | Overall composite 90/100; affordability 60, air 86, energy 92. |
|---|
| #5 | TokyoJapan | 89/100 | Overall composite 89/100; affordability 68, air 78, energy 84. |
|---|
| #6 | ViennaAustria | 89/100 | Overall composite 89/100; affordability 72, air 84, energy 87. |
|---|
| #7 | OsloNorway | 89/100 | Overall composite 89/100; affordability 56, air 87, energy 95. |
|---|
| #8 | AmsterdamNetherlands | 88/100 | Overall composite 88/100; affordability 60, air 85, energy 89. |
|---|
| #9 | HelsinkiFinland | 88/100 | Overall composite 88/100; affordability 63, air 88, energy 88. |
|---|
| #10 | MunichGermany | 88/100 | Overall composite 88/100; affordability 58, air 80, energy 84. |
|---|
| #11 | GenevaSwitzerland | 87/100 | Overall composite 87/100; affordability 60, air 84, energy 82. |
|---|
| #12 | ParisFrance | 86/100 | Overall composite 86/100; affordability 55, air 76, energy 86. |
|---|
| #13 | SeoulSouth Korea | 86/100 | Overall composite 86/100; affordability 60, air 70, energy 82. |
|---|
| #14 | MelbourneAustralia | 86/100 | Overall composite 86/100; affordability 60, air 84, energy 78. |
|---|
| #15 | KyotoJapan | 86/100 | Overall composite 86/100; affordability 72, air 82, energy 78. |
|---|
| #16 | BaselSwitzerland | 86/100 | Overall composite 86/100; affordability 62, air 84, energy 82. |
|---|
| #17 | KumamotoJapan | 86/100 | Overall composite 86/100; affordability 54, air 72, energy 78. |
|---|
| #18 | SakaiJapan | 86/100 | Overall composite 86/100; affordability 54, air 73, energy 78. |
|---|
| #19 | OkazakiJapan | 86/100 | Overall composite 86/100; affordability 54, air 63, energy 81. |
|---|
| #20 | AmagasakiJapan | 86/100 | Overall composite 86/100; affordability 54, air 73, energy 80. |
|---|
| #21 | KōriyamaJapan | 86/100 | Overall composite 86/100; affordability 54, air 68, energy 86. |
|---|
| #22 | LondonUnited Kingdom | 85/100 | Overall composite 85/100; affordability 52, air 75, energy 84. |
|---|
| #23 | SydneyAustralia | 85/100 | Overall composite 85/100; affordability 50, air 82, energy 80. |
|---|
| #24 | HamburgGermany | 85/100 | Overall composite 85/100; affordability 64, air 80, energy 82. |
|---|
| #25 | EdinburghUnited Kingdom | 85/100 | Overall composite 85/100; affordability 62, air 82, energy 80. |
|---|
| #26 | ToyamaJapan | 85/100 | Overall composite 85/100; affordability 55, air 67, energy 86. |
|---|
| #27 | Ōita-shiJapan | 85/100 | Overall composite 85/100; affordability 55, air 66, energy 86. |
|---|
| #28 | Kōchi-shiJapan | 85/100 | Overall composite 85/100; affordability 55, air 66, energy 84. |
|---|
| #29 | YamagataJapan | 85/100 | Overall composite 85/100; affordability 55, air 67, energy 85. |
|---|
| #30 | FunabashiJapan | 85/100 | Overall composite 85/100; affordability 55, air 67, energy 83. |
|---|
| #31 | TakasakiJapan | 85/100 | Overall composite 85/100; affordability 55, air 63, energy 85. |
|---|
| #32 | IwataJapan | 85/100 | Overall composite 85/100; affordability 55, air 71, energy 78. |
|---|
| #33 | MarugameJapan | 85/100 | Overall composite 85/100; affordability 55, air 64, energy 83. |
|---|
| #34 | IchinomiyaJapan | 85/100 | Overall composite 85/100; affordability 55, air 64, energy 85. |
|---|
| #35 | KaratsuJapan | 85/100 | Overall composite 85/100; affordability 55, air 71, energy 81. |
|---|
| #36 | MishimaJapan | 85/100 | Overall composite 85/100; affordability 55, air 71, energy 83. |
|---|
| #37 | MuroranJapan | 85/100 | Overall composite 85/100; affordability 55, air 73, energy 83. |
|---|
| #38 | New YorkUnited States | 84/100 | Overall composite 84/100; affordability 49, air 72, energy 82. |
|---|
| #39 | BerlinGermany | 84/100 | Overall composite 84/100; affordability 70, air 80, energy 88. |
|---|
| #40 | Hong KongHong Kong | 84/100 | Overall composite 84/100; affordability 50, air 70, energy 78. |
|---|
| #41 | San FranciscoUnited States | 84/100 | Overall composite 84/100; affordability 50, air 78, energy 86. |
|---|
| #42 | AucklandNew Zealand | 84/100 | Overall composite 84/100; affordability 56, air 86, energy 86. |
|---|
| #43 | VancouverCanada | 84/100 | Overall composite 84/100; affordability 56, air 86, energy 90. |
|---|
| #44 | SeattleUnited States | 84/100 | Overall composite 84/100; affordability 60, air 84, energy 90. |
|---|
| #45 | TaipeiTaiwan | 84/100 | Overall composite 84/100; affordability 70, air 76, energy 78. |
|---|
| #46 | BrisbaneAustralia | 84/100 | Overall composite 84/100; affordability 64, air 84, energy 78. |
|---|
| #47 | OsakaJapan | 84/100 | Overall composite 84/100; affordability 70, air 78, energy 78. |
|---|
| #48 | WellingtonNew Zealand | 84/100 | Overall composite 84/100; affordability 64, air 88, energy 88. |
|---|
| #49 | UtrechtNetherlands | 84/100 | Overall composite 84/100; affordability 70, air 80, energy 80. |
|---|
| #50 | Gjøvik MunicipalityNorway | 84/100 | Overall composite 84/100; affordability 38, air 79, energy 84. |
|---|
| #51 | EgersundNorway | 84/100 | Overall composite 84/100; affordability 38, air 80, energy 85. |
|---|
| #52 | SuwonSouth Korea | 84/100 | Overall composite 84/100; affordability 52, air 59, energy 83. |
|---|
| #53 | HiroshimaJapan | 84/100 | Overall composite 84/100; affordability 56, air 72, energy 79. |
|---|
| #54 | ChangwonSouth Korea | 84/100 | Overall composite 84/100; affordability 52, air 61, energy 79. |
|---|
| #55 | SendaiJapan | 84/100 | Overall composite 84/100; affordability 56, air 73, energy 78. |
|---|
| #56 | AnsanSouth Korea | 84/100 | Overall composite 84/100; affordability 52, air 58, energy 84. |
|---|
| #57 | GangneungSouth Korea | 84/100 | Overall composite 84/100; affordability 52, air 58, energy 79. |
|---|
| #58 | PyeongtaekSouth Korea | 84/100 | Overall composite 84/100; affordability 52, air 65, energy 78. |
|---|
| #59 | GumiSouth Korea | 84/100 | Overall composite 84/100; affordability 52, air 64, energy 78. |
|---|
| #60 | TakamatsuJapan | 84/100 | Overall composite 84/100; affordability 56, air 71, energy 83. |
|---|
| #61 | GeojeSouth Korea | 84/100 | Overall composite 84/100; affordability 52, air 65, energy 81. |
|---|
| #62 | ToyohashiJapan | 84/100 | Overall composite 84/100; affordability 56, air 64, energy 83. |
|---|
| #63 | SagamiharaJapan | 84/100 | Overall composite 84/100; affordability 56, air 67, energy 78. |
|---|
| #64 | OdawaraJapan | 84/100 | Overall composite 84/100; affordability 56, air 72, energy 79. |
|---|
| #65 | NagaokaJapan | 84/100 | Overall composite 84/100; affordability 56, air 67, energy 82. |
|---|
| #66 | HikoneJapan | 84/100 | Overall composite 84/100; affordability 56, air 66, energy 78. |
|---|
| #67 | KasugaiJapan | 84/100 | Overall composite 84/100; affordability 56, air 69, energy 79. |
|---|
| #68 | KoshigayaJapan | 84/100 | Overall composite 84/100; affordability 56, air 66, energy 85. |
|---|
| #69 | TorontoCanada | 83/100 | Overall composite 83/100; affordability 55, air 80, energy 82. |
|---|
| #70 | MadridSpain | 83/100 | Overall composite 83/100; affordability 72, air 78, energy 80. |
|---|
| #71 | SolothurnSwitzerland | 83/100 | Overall composite 83/100; affordability 36, air 85, energy 80. |
|---|
| #72 | DavosSwitzerland | 83/100 | Overall composite 83/100; affordability 36, air 80, energy 81. |
|---|
| #73 | KirunaSweden | 83/100 | Overall composite 83/100; affordability 42, air 87, energy 81. |
|---|
| #74 | KotkaFinland | 83/100 | Overall composite 83/100; affordability 43, air 80, energy 79. |
|---|
| #75 | ForssaFinland | 83/100 | Overall composite 83/100; affordability 43, air 82, energy 84. |
|---|
| #76 | Mo i RanaNorway | 83/100 | Overall composite 83/100; affordability 39, air 80, energy 85. |
|---|
| #77 | YlöjärviFinland | 83/100 | Overall composite 83/100; affordability 43, air 85, energy 79. |
|---|
| #78 | AltaNorway | 83/100 | Overall composite 83/100; affordability 39, air 82, energy 84. |
|---|
| #79 | RaisioFinland | 83/100 | Overall composite 83/100; affordability 43, air 88, energy 83. |
|---|
| #80 | KungälvSweden | 83/100 | Overall composite 83/100; affordability 42, air 79, energy 80. |
|---|
| #81 | JämsäFinland | 83/100 | Overall composite 83/100; affordability 43, air 83, energy 85. |
|---|
| #82 | DrøbakNorway | 83/100 | Overall composite 83/100; affordability 39, air 83, energy 82. |
|---|
| #83 | PorsgrunnNorway | 83/100 | Overall composite 83/100; affordability 39, air 84, energy 86. |
|---|
| #84 | TønderDenmark | 83/100 | Overall composite 83/100; affordability 42, air 85, energy 86. |
|---|
| #85 | VordingborgDenmark | 83/100 | Overall composite 83/100; affordability 42, air 86, energy 81. |
|---|
| #86 | Eidsvoll MunicipalityNorway | 83/100 | Overall composite 83/100; affordability 39, air 80, energy 86. |
|---|
| #87 | Karmøy MunicipalityNorway | 83/100 | Overall composite 83/100; affordability 39, air 84, energy 86. |
|---|
| #88 | ArvikaSweden | 83/100 | Overall composite 83/100; affordability 42, air 82, energy 82. |
|---|
| #89 | JejuSouth Korea | 83/100 | Overall composite 83/100; affordability 53, air 66, energy 85. |
|---|
| #90 | SeongnamSouth Korea | 83/100 | Overall composite 83/100; affordability 53, air 63, energy 79. |
|---|
| #91 | KanazawaJapan | 83/100 | Overall composite 83/100; affordability 57, air 65, energy 85. |
|---|
| #92 | HwaseongSouth Korea | 83/100 | Overall composite 83/100; affordability 53, air 59, energy 84. |
|---|
| #93 | KitakyūshūJapan | 83/100 | Overall composite 83/100; affordability 57, air 72, energy 81. |
|---|
| #94 | NamyangjuSouth Korea | 83/100 | Overall composite 83/100; affordability 53, air 64, energy 79. |
|---|
| #95 | AkitaJapan | 83/100 | Overall composite 83/100; affordability 57, air 67, energy 81. |
|---|
| #96 | GimpoSouth Korea | 83/100 | Overall composite 83/100; affordability 53, air 62, energy 84. |
|---|
| #97 | TottoriJapan | 83/100 | Overall composite 83/100; affordability 57, air 70, energy 86. |
|---|
| #98 | ObihiroJapan | 83/100 | Overall composite 83/100; affordability 57, air 68, energy 80. |
|---|
| #99 | ShimonosekiJapan | 83/100 | Overall composite 83/100; affordability 57, air 72, energy 84. |
|---|
| #100 | SakuraJapan | 83/100 | Overall composite 83/100; affordability 57, air 72, energy 85. |
|---|