| #1 | ViennaAustria | 79/100 | Affordability 72/100 with overall context 89/100. |
|---|
| #2 | KigaliRwanda | 78/100 | Affordability 80/100 with overall context 74/100. |
|---|
| #3 | KyotoJapan | 78/100 | Affordability 72/100 with overall context 86/100. |
|---|
| #4 | Cluj-NapocaRomania | 78/100 | Affordability 80/100 with overall context 74/100. |
|---|
| #5 | BangkokThailand | 77/100 | Affordability 78/100 with overall context 76/100. |
|---|
| #6 | Mexico CityMexico | 77/100 | Affordability 78/100 with overall context 75/100. |
|---|
| #7 | PragueCzechia | 77/100 | Affordability 74/100 with overall context 81/100. |
|---|
| #8 | BogotáColombia | 77/100 | Affordability 80/100 with overall context 72/100. |
|---|
| #9 | Kuala LumpurMalaysia | 77/100 | Affordability 78/100 with overall context 76/100. |
|---|
| #10 | BrnoCzechia | 77/100 | Affordability 78/100 with overall context 76/100. |
|---|
| #11 | ŁódźPoland | 77/100 | Affordability 80/100 with overall context 72/100. |
|---|
| #12 | Quebec CityCanada | 77/100 | Affordability 76/100 with overall context 78/100. |
|---|
| #13 | HalleGermany | 76/100 | Affordability 80/100 with overall context 69/100. |
|---|
| #14 | ChemnitzGermany | 76/100 | Affordability 80/100 with overall context 69/100. |
|---|
| #15 | CopenhagenDenmark | 76/100 | Affordability 66/100 with overall context 91/100. |
|---|
| #16 | TokyoJapan | 76/100 | Affordability 68/100 with overall context 89/100. |
|---|
| #17 | BerlinGermany | 76/100 | Affordability 70/100 with overall context 84/100. |
|---|
| #18 | NairobiKenya | 76/100 | Affordability 80/100 with overall context 70/100. |
|---|
| #19 | MadridSpain | 76/100 | Affordability 72/100 with overall context 83/100. |
|---|
| #20 | WarsawPoland | 76/100 | Affordability 74/100 with overall context 79/100. |
|---|
| #21 | Buenos AiresArgentina | 76/100 | Affordability 76/100 with overall context 76/100. |
|---|
| #22 | TaipeiTaiwan | 76/100 | Affordability 70/100 with overall context 84/100. |
|---|
| #23 | JakartaIndonesia | 76/100 | Affordability 80/100 with overall context 70/100. |
|---|
| #24 | OsakaJapan | 76/100 | Affordability 70/100 with overall context 84/100. |
|---|
| #25 | Ho Chi Minh CityVietnam | 76/100 | Affordability 80/100 with overall context 70/100. |
|---|
| #26 | HanoiVietnam | 76/100 | Affordability 82/100 with overall context 68/100. |
|---|
| #27 | QuitoEcuador | 76/100 | Affordability 80/100 with overall context 70/100. |
|---|
| #28 | BudapestHungary | 76/100 | Affordability 78/100 with overall context 73/100. |
|---|
| #29 | BucharestRomania | 76/100 | Affordability 80/100 with overall context 70/100. |
|---|
| #30 | FukuokaJapan | 76/100 | Affordability 74/100 with overall context 78/100. |
|---|
| #31 | Chiang MaiThailand | 76/100 | Affordability 80/100 with overall context 70/100. |
|---|
| #32 | PortoPortugal | 76/100 | Affordability 74/100 with overall context 79/100. |
|---|
| #33 | KrakowPoland | 76/100 | Affordability 76/100 with overall context 77/100. |
|---|
| #34 | UtrechtNetherlands | 76/100 | Affordability 70/100 with overall context 84/100. |
|---|
| #35 | OttawaCanada | 76/100 | Affordability 72/100 with overall context 81/100. |
|---|
| #36 | GuadalajaraMexico | 76/100 | Affordability 76/100 with overall context 75/100. |
|---|
| #37 | SapporoJapan | 76/100 | Affordability 74/100 with overall context 79/100. |
|---|
| #38 | DaeguSouth Korea | 76/100 | Affordability 76/100 with overall context 77/100. |
|---|
| #39 | IncheonSouth Korea | 76/100 | Affordability 74/100 with overall context 80/100. |
|---|
| #40 | KaohsiungTaiwan | 76/100 | Affordability 76/100 with overall context 76/100. |
|---|
| #41 | Da NangVietnam | 76/100 | Affordability 78/100 with overall context 73/100. |
|---|
| #42 | LeipzigGermany | 76/100 | Affordability 76/100 with overall context 76/100. |
|---|
| #43 | DresdenGermany | 76/100 | Affordability 76/100 with overall context 75/100. |
|---|
| #44 | PoznańPoland | 76/100 | Affordability 78/100 with overall context 74/100. |
|---|
| #45 | WinnipegCanada | 76/100 | Affordability 78/100 with overall context 72/100. |
|---|
| #46 | WałbrzychPoland | 75/100 | Affordability 81/100 with overall context 65/100. |
|---|
| #47 | KaliszPoland | 75/100 | Affordability 80/100 with overall context 67/100. |
|---|
| #48 | LegnicaPoland | 75/100 | Affordability 80/100 with overall context 67/100. |
|---|
| #49 | RadomPoland | 75/100 | Affordability 80/100 with overall context 68/100. |
|---|
| #50 | Bielsko-BiałaPoland | 75/100 | Affordability 78/100 with overall context 70/100. |
|---|
| #51 | ZabrzePoland | 75/100 | Affordability 80/100 with overall context 67/100. |
|---|
| #52 | BytomPoland | 75/100 | Affordability 81/100 with overall context 65/100. |
|---|
| #53 | Ruda ŚląskaPoland | 75/100 | Affordability 81/100 with overall context 65/100. |
|---|
| #54 | TychyPoland | 75/100 | Affordability 79/100 with overall context 68/100. |
|---|
| #55 | MagdeburgGermany | 75/100 | Affordability 78/100 with overall context 70/100. |
|---|
| #56 | KielcePoland | 75/100 | Affordability 79/100 with overall context 70/100. |
|---|
| #57 | OpolePoland | 75/100 | Affordability 78/100 with overall context 71/100. |
|---|
| #58 | SosnowiecPoland | 75/100 | Affordability 80/100 with overall context 68/100. |
|---|
| #59 | GliwicePoland | 75/100 | Affordability 78/100 with overall context 70/100. |
|---|
| #60 | CzęstochowaPoland | 75/100 | Affordability 80/100 with overall context 68/100. |
|---|
| #61 | OsijekCroatia | 75/100 | Affordability 80/100 with overall context 67/100. |
|---|
| #62 | São PauloBrazil | 75/100 | Affordability 74/100 with overall context 76/100. |
|---|
| #63 | Cape TownSouth Africa | 75/100 | Affordability 76/100 with overall context 74/100. |
|---|
| #64 | LisbonPortugal | 75/100 | Affordability 70/100 with overall context 82/100. |
|---|
| #65 | LimaPeru | 75/100 | Affordability 78/100 with overall context 70/100. |
|---|
| #66 | ManilaPhilippines | 75/100 | Affordability 78/100 with overall context 70/100. |
|---|
| #67 | MumbaiIndia | 75/100 | Affordability 78/100 with overall context 70/100. |
|---|
| #68 | CasablancaMorocco | 75/100 | Affordability 78/100 with overall context 70/100. |
|---|
| #69 | Addis AbabaEthiopia | 75/100 | Affordability 82/100 with overall context 64/100. |
|---|
| #70 | MontevideoUruguay | 75/100 | Affordability 72/100 with overall context 80/100. |
|---|
| #71 | BelgradeSerbia | 75/100 | Affordability 80/100 with overall context 68/100. |
|---|
| #72 | VilniusLithuania | 75/100 | Affordability 76/100 with overall context 74/100. |
|---|
| #73 | MedellínColombia | 75/100 | Affordability 78/100 with overall context 70/100. |
|---|
| #74 | BilbaoSpain | 75/100 | Affordability 72/100 with overall context 79/100. |
|---|
| #75 | GdanskPoland | 75/100 | Affordability 74/100 with overall context 76/100. |
|---|
| #76 | WroclawPoland | 75/100 | Affordability 74/100 with overall context 77/100. |
|---|
| #77 | RotterdamNetherlands | 75/100 | Affordability 70/100 with overall context 82/100. |
|---|
| #78 | NagoyaJapan | 75/100 | Affordability 70/100 with overall context 82/100. |
|---|
| #79 | MalagaSpain | 75/100 | Affordability 74/100 with overall context 76/100. |
|---|
| #80 | ZaragozaSpain | 75/100 | Affordability 76/100 with overall context 74/100. |
|---|
| #81 | GranadaSpain | 75/100 | Affordability 76/100 with overall context 74/100. |
|---|
| #82 | TampereFinland | 75/100 | Affordability 72/100 with overall context 80/100. |
|---|
| #83 | PittsburghUnited States | 75/100 | Affordability 76/100 with overall context 74/100. |
|---|
| #84 | MadisonUnited States | 75/100 | Affordability 74/100 with overall context 76/100. |
|---|
| #85 | BrașovRomania | 75/100 | Affordability 78/100 with overall context 70/100. |
|---|
| #86 | PlovdivBulgaria | 75/100 | Affordability 80/100 with overall context 68/100. |
|---|
| #87 | IndianapolisUnited States | 75/100 | Affordability 77/100 with overall context 71/100. |
|---|
| #88 | St. LouisUnited States | 75/100 | Affordability 78/100 with overall context 70/100. |
|---|
| #89 | Kansas CityUnited States | 75/100 | Affordability 78/100 with overall context 71/100. |
|---|
| #90 | San AntonioUnited States | 75/100 | Affordability 77/100 with overall context 71/100. |
|---|
| #91 | CincinnatiUnited States | 75/100 | Affordability 77/100 with overall context 71/100. |
|---|
| #92 | BourgesFrance | 74/100 | Affordability 80/100 with overall context 66/100. |
|---|
| #93 | NiortFrance | 74/100 | Affordability 78/100 with overall context 67/100. |
|---|
| #94 | Saint-QuentinFrance | 74/100 | Affordability 82/100 with overall context 62/100. |
|---|
| #95 | MontbéliardFrance | 74/100 | Affordability 80/100 with overall context 64/100. |
|---|
| #96 | Dąbrowa GórniczaPoland | 74/100 | Affordability 80/100 with overall context 66/100. |
|---|
| #97 | ElblągPoland | 74/100 | Affordability 79/100 with overall context 67/100. |
|---|
| #98 | PłockPoland | 74/100 | Affordability 78/100 with overall context 67/100. |
|---|
| #99 | KoszalinPoland | 74/100 | Affordability 78/100 with overall context 68/100. |
|---|
| #100 | TarnówPoland | 74/100 | Affordability 79/100 with overall context 67/100. |
|---|