Safety score
Personal safety, institutional trust, and resilience signals informed by international safety and crime data.
Safety
London has solid safety with neighborhood variation. Violent-crime context is comparatively low; opportunistic risks are concentrated in transit and tourist hubs. Safety in London scores 79/100, placing it in the solid group of the indexed set.
Personal safety, institutional trust, and resilience signals informed by international safety and crime data.
79/100
Solid score reinforced by institutional response capacity.
Low-moderate
Violent-crime context is comparatively low globally.
Phone snatching
High-traffic central areas concentrate opportunistic property crime.
This HTML table mirrors the visible score cards so important comparison data is never trapped in a browser-only chart.
| Metric | Value | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Safety score | 79/100 | Resident experience varies by neighborhood. |
| Violent-crime context | Low-moderate | Long-run trend is favorable but not flat. |
| Watch item | Phone snatching | Awareness in busy transit hubs remains useful. |
A crawlable comparison across a selection of same-country and top-scoring cities. The complete set is reachable via the rankings, the cities index, and each city profile.
| City | Score | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| London (this page) | 79/100 | London has solid safety with neighborhood variation. Violent-crime context is comparatively low; opportunistic risks are concentrated in transit and tourist hubs. |
| Edinburgh | 88/100 | Edinburgh scores well on safety, with stable institutional response and steady public-safety perception. |
| Manchester | 75/100 | Manchester's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Bristol | 75/100 | Bristol's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Reading | 74/100 | Reading's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Leeds | 74/100 | Leeds's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Cambridge | 74/100 | Cambridge's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Birmingham | 73/100 | Birmingham's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Cardiff | 73/100 | Cardiff's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Oxford | 73/100 | Oxford's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Bournemouth | 72/100 | Bournemouth's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Milton Keynes | 72/100 | Milton Keynes's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Glasgow | 72/100 | Glasgow's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Brighton | 72/100 | Brighton's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Belfast | 71/100 | Belfast's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Liverpool | 70/100 | Liverpool's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Sheffield | 70/100 | Sheffield's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Southend-on-Sea | 69/100 | Southend-on-Sea's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Northampton | 68/100 | Northampton's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Preston | 67/100 | Preston's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Luton | 66/100 | Luton's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Middlesbrough | 65/100 | Middlesbrough's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Chester | 61/100 | Chester's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Stirling | 60/100 | Stirling's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Newport | 58/100 | Newport's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Leicester | 58/100 | Leicester's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Wrexham | 57/100 | Wrexham's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Gloucester | 57/100 | Gloucester's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Coventry | 57/100 | Coventry's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Swindon | 56/100 | Swindon's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Portsmouth | 56/100 | Portsmouth's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
Safety scoring weighs violent-crime context, neighborhood variation, and institutional response. Large global cities tend to have visible opportunistic risk patterns. Across the indexed cities the safety average is 63/100, so London is 16 points above the median. Data year 2025; last updated 2026-05-16. Drawn from 2 institutional references.
Read this module with the main open the london city profile and the read the scoring methodology page so single-topic pages do not hide tradeoffs across dimensions.
Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation. Verified datasets are being integrated; official sources should be used for critical decisions.
2 institutional references inform this view, listed below with reliability notes. Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation; verified datasets are being integrated and official sources should be used for critical decisions.
Used as a directional benchmark for relative city safety framing.
Used as a policy and methodology reference for urban exposure and resilience signals.
These links connect module pages back to city, ranking, and sibling topic paths with crawlable href values.
Return to the complete London profile with all module scores and source context.
Affordability, essential costs, and day-to-day financial pressure for residents.
Health-oriented air-quality conditions with context from WHO, EEA, and EPA benchmarks.
Clean-energy readiness, grid resilience, and solar or efficiency opportunity signals.
Broadband and mobile connectivity quality, latency, and digital-readiness signals for residents and remote workers.
Climate exposure, hazard frequency, and adaptation context for floods, heat, storms, and wildfires.
A balanced ranking of cities across affordability, air quality, clean-energy readiness, and resilience.
Cities that combine strong services, mobility, safety, clean air, and resilience into a healthy day-to-day profile.