Internet Speed score
Broadband and mobile connectivity quality, latency, and digital-readiness signals for residents and remote workers.
Internet Speed
London delivers fast broadband and strong mobile coverage, supporting global financial services and remote work. Internet Speed in London scores 85/100, placing it in the strong group of the indexed set.
Broadband and mobile connectivity quality, latency, and digital-readiness signals for residents and remote workers.
245 Mbps
Strong fixed-broadband performance across the metro.
130 Mbps
Reliable mobile experience supports hybrid work.
Comprehensive
Fiber and cable footprints reach most residential areas.
This HTML table mirrors the visible score cards so important comparison data is never trapped in a browser-only chart.
| Metric | Value | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Fixed broadband median | 245 Mbps | Top-tier among large European cities. |
| Mobile median | 130 Mbps | Coverage and capacity scale with demand. |
| Coverage | Comprehensive | Service variety supports household choice. |
A crawlable comparison across a selection of same-country and top-scoring cities. The complete set is reachable via the rankings, the cities index, and each city profile.
| City | Score | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| London (this page) | 85/100 | London delivers fast broadband and strong mobile coverage, supporting global financial services and remote work. |
| Edinburgh | 84/100 | Edinburgh offers reliable broadband and mobile networks supporting digital services and remote work. |
| Manchester | 75/100 | Manchester's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| Bristol | 75/100 | Bristol's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| Cambridge | 75/100 | Cambridge's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| Reading | 74/100 | Reading's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| Leeds | 74/100 | Leeds's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| Oxford | 74/100 | Oxford's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| Birmingham | 73/100 | Birmingham's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| Glasgow | 73/100 | Glasgow's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| Cardiff | 73/100 | Cardiff's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| Brighton | 73/100 | Brighton's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| Bournemouth | 72/100 | Bournemouth's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| Milton Keynes | 72/100 | Milton Keynes's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| Belfast | 71/100 | Belfast's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| Liverpool | 71/100 | Liverpool's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| Sheffield | 71/100 | Sheffield's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| Southend-on-Sea | 70/100 | Southend-on-Sea's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| Northampton | 69/100 | Northampton's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| Preston | 67/100 | Preston's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| Luton | 67/100 | Luton's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| Middlesbrough | 65/100 | Middlesbrough's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| Chester | 59/100 | Chester's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| Stirling | 59/100 | Stirling's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| Leicester | 59/100 | Leicester's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| Coventry | 59/100 | Coventry's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| Portsmouth | 59/100 | Portsmouth's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| Derby | 59/100 | Derby's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| Newport | 58/100 | Newport's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| Gloucester | 57/100 | Gloucester's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| Bradford | 57/100 | Bradford's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
Connectivity scoring weighs fixed broadband, mobile performance, latency, and digital-readiness depth. London ranks well across all dimensions. Across the indexed cities the internet speed average is 64/100, so London is 21 points above the median. Data year 2025; last updated 2026-05-16. Drawn from 2 institutional references.
Read this module with the main open the london city profile and the read the scoring methodology page so single-topic pages do not hide tradeoffs across dimensions.
Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation. Verified datasets are being integrated; official sources should be used for critical decisions.
2 institutional references inform this view, listed below with reliability notes. Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation; verified datasets are being integrated and official sources should be used for critical decisions.
Used as the connectivity reference for national and city-level digital-readiness signals.
Used as a directional speed and latency reference for city connectivity scoring.
These links connect module pages back to city, ranking, and sibling topic paths with crawlable href values.
Return to the complete London profile with all module scores and source context.
Affordability, essential costs, and day-to-day financial pressure for residents.
Health-oriented air-quality conditions with context from WHO, EEA, and EPA benchmarks.
Clean-energy readiness, grid resilience, and solar or efficiency opportunity signals.
Personal safety, institutional trust, and resilience signals informed by international safety and crime data.
Climate exposure, hazard frequency, and adaptation context for floods, heat, storms, and wildfires.
A balanced ranking of cities across affordability, air quality, clean-energy readiness, and resilience.
Cities that combine strong services, mobility, safety, clean air, and resilience into a healthy day-to-day profile.