Climate Risk score
Climate exposure, hazard frequency, and adaptation context for floods, heat, storms, and wildfires.
Climate Risk
London faces moderate climate exposure shaped by heat waves, Thames flood scenarios, and urban surface-water flooding. Climate Risk in London scores 72/100, placing it in the solid group of the indexed set.
Climate exposure, hazard frequency, and adaptation context for floods, heat, storms, and wildfires.
Heat and surface flood
Heat waves and surface flooding are the main hazards.
Moderate
Thames Barrier reduces tidal-surge exposure in central areas.
Strong
Long-term flood and climate plans provide continuity.
This HTML table mirrors the visible score cards so important comparison data is never trapped in a browser-only chart.
| Metric | Value | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Primary hazard | Heat and surface flood | Concurrent hazards shape adaptation priorities. |
| Flood exposure | Moderate | Surface flooding remains a localized challenge. |
| Adaptation capacity | Strong | Implementation depth supports a healthy score. |
A crawlable comparison across a selection of same-country and top-scoring cities. The complete set is reachable via the rankings, the cities index, and each city profile.
| City | Score | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| London (this page) | 72/100 | London faces moderate climate exposure shaped by heat waves, Thames flood scenarios, and urban surface-water flooding. |
| Edinburgh | 80/100 | Edinburgh carries moderate climate risk centered on coastal storm exposure and heavy-rain stormwater pressure. |
| Reading | 74/100 | Reading's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Manchester | 74/100 | Manchester's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Bristol | 74/100 | Bristol's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Bournemouth | 72/100 | Bournemouth's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Milton Keynes | 72/100 | Milton Keynes's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Birmingham | 72/100 | Birmingham's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Leeds | 72/100 | Leeds's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Cardiff | 72/100 | Cardiff's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Glasgow | 70/100 | Glasgow's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Belfast | 70/100 | Belfast's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Oxford | 70/100 | Oxford's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Cambridge | 70/100 | Cambridge's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Brighton | 70/100 | Brighton's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Southend-on-Sea | 68/100 | Southend-on-Sea's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Northampton | 68/100 | Northampton's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Liverpool | 68/100 | Liverpool's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Sheffield | 68/100 | Sheffield's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Preston | 66/100 | Preston's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Luton | 66/100 | Luton's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Middlesbrough | 64/100 | Middlesbrough's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Chester | 62/100 | Chester's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Stirling | 60/100 | Stirling's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Newport | 58/100 | Newport's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Wrexham | 58/100 | Wrexham's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Leicester | 57/100 | Leicester's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Gloucester | 56/100 | Gloucester's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Swindon | 56/100 | Swindon's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Coventry | 56/100 | Coventry's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Derby | 55/100 | Derby's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
London's climate-risk profile blends heat exposure, river-flood scenarios, and surface-water risk in dense areas. Adaptation programs are well established. Across the indexed cities the climate risk average is 62/100, so London is 10 points above the median. Data year 2025; last updated 2026-05-16. Drawn from 3 institutional references.
Read this module with the main open the london city profile and the read the scoring methodology page so single-topic pages do not hide tradeoffs across dimensions.
Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation. Verified datasets are being integrated; official sources should be used for critical decisions.
3 institutional references inform this view, listed below with reliability notes. Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation; verified datasets are being integrated and official sources should be used for critical decisions.
Used to explain urban climate vulnerability and adaptation scoring logic.
Used as an energy-resource and weather-normalization reference.
Used as a policy and methodology reference for urban exposure and resilience signals.
These links connect module pages back to city, ranking, and sibling topic paths with crawlable href values.
Return to the complete London profile with all module scores and source context.
Affordability, essential costs, and day-to-day financial pressure for residents.
Health-oriented air-quality conditions with context from WHO, EEA, and EPA benchmarks.
Clean-energy readiness, grid resilience, and solar or efficiency opportunity signals.
Personal safety, institutional trust, and resilience signals informed by international safety and crime data.
Broadband and mobile connectivity quality, latency, and digital-readiness signals for residents and remote workers.
A balanced ranking of cities across affordability, air quality, clean-energy readiness, and resilience.
Cities that combine strong services, mobility, safety, clean air, and resilience into a healthy day-to-day profile.