Module profile
Safety score
82/100
Personal safety, institutional trust, and resilience signals informed by international safety and crime data.
Safety in Tel Aviv82/100
Safety
Safety in Tel Aviv
Tel Aviv scores well on day-to-day safety with stable institutional response. Safety in Tel Aviv scores 82/100, placing it in the strong group of the indexed set.
- Last updated
- 2026-05-16
- Data year
- 2025
- Module score
- 82/100
Safety score
82/100
Healthy directional score.
Resident perception
Strong
Day-to-day perception is generally positive in central districts.
Watch item
Property crime
Opportunistic property risks remain the practical pain point.
Tel Aviv safety data table
This HTML table mirrors the visible score cards so important comparison data is never trapped in a browser-only chart.
| Metric | Value | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Safety score | 82/100 | Stable institutional response supports the score. |
| Resident perception | Strong | District-level variation shapes experience. |
| Watch item | Property crime | Common-sense precautions still useful. |
Safety city comparison
A crawlable comparison across a selection of same-country and top-scoring cities. The complete set is reachable via the rankings, the cities index, and each city profile.
| City | Score | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Tel Aviv (this page) | 82/100 | Tel Aviv scores well on day-to-day safety with stable institutional response. |
| Rishon LeZion | 78/100 | Rishon LeZion's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Beersheba | 77/100 | Beersheba's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Ashdod | 77/100 | Ashdod's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Haifa | 76/100 | Haifa's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Ashkelon | 76/100 | Ashkelon's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Petah Tikva | 76/100 | Petah Tikva's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Tiberias | 76/100 | Tiberias's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Rehovot | 76/100 | Rehovot's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Safed | 76/100 | Safed's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Bnei Brak | 76/100 | Bnei Brak's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Netanya | 75/100 | Netanya's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Holon | 75/100 | Holon's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Hadera | 75/100 | Hadera's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Acre | 74/100 | Acre's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Ramat Gan | 74/100 | Ramat Gan's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Ramla | 74/100 | Ramla's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Beit Shemesh | 74/100 | Beit Shemesh's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Bat Yam | 73/100 | Bat Yam's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Eilat | 72/100 | Eilat's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Nazareth | 71/100 | Nazareth's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Singapore | 95/100 | Singapore is among the safest cities globally, with very low violent-crime context and strong institutional response. |
| Tokyo | 93/100 | Tokyo scores at the very top globally on safety, with very low violent-crime context, strong institutions, and high resident perception of safety. |
| Kyoto | 93/100 | Kyoto scores very high on safety, with stable institutional response and steady public-safety perception. |
| Copenhagen | 92/100 | Copenhagen scores high on safety due to strong public trust, low violent-crime context, and reliable institutional response. |
| Osaka | 92/100 | Osaka scores high on safety, with strong institutional response and steady public-safety perception. |
| Zurich | 91/100 | Zurich is among the safest large European cities, with very low violent-crime context and strong institutional response. |
| Seoul | 90/100 | Seoul is among the safer large global cities, with low violent-crime context, strong institutional response, and consistent public-space confidence. |
| Taipei | 90/100 | Taipei is among the safer large global cities, with very low violent-crime context and consistent neighborhood experience. |
| Doha | 90/100 | Doha is among the safer global cities, with very low violent-crime context and consistent neighborhood experience. |
| Abu Dhabi | 90/100 | Abu Dhabi is among the safer global cities, with very low violent-crime context and consistent neighborhood experience. |
Interpretation
Safety blends day-to-day crime context, perception, and response capacity. Across the indexed cities the safety average is 70/100, so Tel Aviv is 12 points above the median. Data year 2025; last updated 2026-05-16. Drawn from 2 institutional references.
Read this module with the main open the tel aviv city profile and the read the scoring methodology page so single-topic pages do not hide tradeoffs across dimensions.
Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation. Verified datasets are being integrated; official sources should be used for critical decisions.
Sources
2 institutional references inform this view, listed below with reliability notes. Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation; verified datasets are being integrated and official sources should be used for critical decisions.
- United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime: UNODC Data Portal
Used as a directional benchmark for relative city safety framing.
- UN-Habitat: World Cities Report 2024
Used as a policy and methodology reference for urban exposure and resilience signals.
Continue exploring
These links connect module pages back to city, ranking, and sibling topic paths with crawlable href values.
Tel Aviv city profile
Return to the complete Tel Aviv profile with all module scores and source context.
Cost of Living in Tel Aviv
Affordability, essential costs, and day-to-day financial pressure for residents.
Air Quality in Tel Aviv
Health-oriented air-quality conditions with context from WHO, EEA, and EPA benchmarks.
Energy in Tel Aviv
Clean-energy readiness, grid resilience, and solar or efficiency opportunity signals.
Internet Speed in Tel Aviv
Broadband and mobile connectivity quality, latency, and digital-readiness signals for residents and remote workers.
Climate Risk in Tel Aviv
Climate exposure, hazard frequency, and adaptation context for floods, heat, storms, and wildfires.
Overall Intelligence
A balanced ranking of cities across affordability, air quality, clean-energy readiness, and resilience.
Quality of Life
Cities that combine strong services, mobility, safety, clean air, and resilience into a healthy day-to-day profile.