Global CityIntelligence

Safety

Safety in Osaka

Osaka scores high on safety, with strong institutional response and steady public-safety perception. Safety in Osaka scores 92/100, placing it in the leading group of the indexed set.

Last updated
2026-05-16
Data year
2025
Module score
92/100

Module profile

Safety score

92/100

Personal safety, institutional trust, and resilience signals informed by international safety and crime data.

Safety in Osaka92/100

Safety score

92/100

Healthy directional score.

Resident perception

Very high

Day-to-day perception is widely positive.

Watch item

Property crime

Opportunistic property risks remain the practical pain point.

Osaka safety data table

This HTML table mirrors the visible score cards so important comparison data is never trapped in a browser-only chart.

Osaka Safety data table
MetricValueContext
Safety score92/100Stable institutional response supports the score.
Resident perceptionVery highPedestrian and night-time perception are widely positive.
Watch itemProperty crimeCommon-sense precautions still useful.

Safety city comparison

A crawlable comparison across a selection of same-country and top-scoring cities. The complete set is reachable via the rankings, the cities index, and each city profile.

Safety city comparison table
CityScoreSummary
Osaka (this page)92/100Osaka scores high on safety, with strong institutional response and steady public-safety perception.
Tokyo93/100Tokyo scores at the very top globally on safety, with very low violent-crime context, strong institutions, and high resident perception of safety.
Kyoto93/100Kyoto scores very high on safety, with stable institutional response and steady public-safety perception.
Marugame87/100Marugame's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
Hiroshima86/100Hiroshima's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
Sendai86/100Sendai's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
Kanazawa86/100Kanazawa's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
Ōita-shi86/100Ōita-shi's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
Toyohashi86/100Toyohashi's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
Funabashi86/100Funabashi's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
Takasaki86/100Takasaki's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
Koshigaya86/100Koshigaya's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
Nagano85/100Nagano's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
Kumamoto85/100Kumamoto's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
Takamatsu85/100Takamatsu's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
Kōchi-shi85/100Kōchi-shi's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
Fukui85/100Fukui's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
Tottori85/100Tottori's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
Matsue85/100Matsue's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
Sagamihara85/100Sagamihara's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
Kurume85/100Kurume's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
Hachinohe85/100Hachinohe's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
Amagasaki85/100Amagasaki's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
Kashiwa85/100Kashiwa's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
Kisarazu85/100Kisarazu's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
Iwaki85/100Iwaki's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
Kobe84/100Kobe's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
Gifu84/100Gifu's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
Akita84/100Akita's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
Morioka84/100Morioka's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
Utsunomiya84/100Utsunomiya's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.

Interpretation

Safety blends violent-crime context, perception, and response capacity. Across the indexed cities the safety average is 70/100, so Osaka is 22 points above the median. Data year 2025; last updated 2026-05-16. Drawn from 2 institutional references.

Read this module with the main open the osaka city profile and the read the scoring methodology page so single-topic pages do not hide tradeoffs across dimensions.

Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation. Verified datasets are being integrated; official sources should be used for critical decisions.

Sources

2 institutional references inform this view, listed below with reliability notes. Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation; verified datasets are being integrated and official sources should be used for critical decisions.

Continue exploring

These links connect module pages back to city, ranking, and sibling topic paths with crawlable href values.

Osaka city profile

Return to the complete Osaka profile with all module scores and source context.

Air Quality in Osaka

Health-oriented air-quality conditions with context from WHO, EEA, and EPA benchmarks.

Energy in Osaka

Clean-energy readiness, grid resilience, and solar or efficiency opportunity signals.

Internet Speed in Osaka

Broadband and mobile connectivity quality, latency, and digital-readiness signals for residents and remote workers.

Climate Risk in Osaka

Climate exposure, hazard frequency, and adaptation context for floods, heat, storms, and wildfires.

Overall Intelligence

A balanced ranking of cities across affordability, air quality, clean-energy readiness, and resilience.

Quality of Life

Cities that combine strong services, mobility, safety, clean air, and resilience into a healthy day-to-day profile.