Module profile
Safety score
92/100
Personal safety, institutional trust, and resilience signals informed by international safety and crime data.
Safety
Osaka scores high on safety, with strong institutional response and steady public-safety perception. Safety in Osaka scores 92/100, placing it in the leading group of the indexed set.
Module profile
92/100
Personal safety, institutional trust, and resilience signals informed by international safety and crime data.
92/100
Healthy directional score.
Very high
Day-to-day perception is widely positive.
Property crime
Opportunistic property risks remain the practical pain point.
This HTML table mirrors the visible score cards so important comparison data is never trapped in a browser-only chart.
| Metric | Value | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Safety score | 92/100 | Stable institutional response supports the score. |
| Resident perception | Very high | Pedestrian and night-time perception are widely positive. |
| Watch item | Property crime | Common-sense precautions still useful. |
A crawlable comparison across a selection of same-country and top-scoring cities. The complete set is reachable via the rankings, the cities index, and each city profile.
| City | Score | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Osaka (this page) | 92/100 | Osaka scores high on safety, with strong institutional response and steady public-safety perception. |
| Tokyo | 93/100 | Tokyo scores at the very top globally on safety, with very low violent-crime context, strong institutions, and high resident perception of safety. |
| Kyoto | 93/100 | Kyoto scores very high on safety, with stable institutional response and steady public-safety perception. |
| Marugame | 87/100 | Marugame's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Hiroshima | 86/100 | Hiroshima's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Sendai | 86/100 | Sendai's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Kanazawa | 86/100 | Kanazawa's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Ōita-shi | 86/100 | Ōita-shi's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Toyohashi | 86/100 | Toyohashi's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Funabashi | 86/100 | Funabashi's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Takasaki | 86/100 | Takasaki's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Koshigaya | 86/100 | Koshigaya's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Nagano | 85/100 | Nagano's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Kumamoto | 85/100 | Kumamoto's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Takamatsu | 85/100 | Takamatsu's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Kōchi-shi | 85/100 | Kōchi-shi's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Fukui | 85/100 | Fukui's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Tottori | 85/100 | Tottori's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Matsue | 85/100 | Matsue's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Sagamihara | 85/100 | Sagamihara's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Kurume | 85/100 | Kurume's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Hachinohe | 85/100 | Hachinohe's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Amagasaki | 85/100 | Amagasaki's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Kashiwa | 85/100 | Kashiwa's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Kisarazu | 85/100 | Kisarazu's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Iwaki | 85/100 | Iwaki's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Kobe | 84/100 | Kobe's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Gifu | 84/100 | Gifu's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Akita | 84/100 | Akita's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Morioka | 84/100 | Morioka's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Utsunomiya | 84/100 | Utsunomiya's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
Safety blends violent-crime context, perception, and response capacity. Across the indexed cities the safety average is 70/100, so Osaka is 22 points above the median. Data year 2025; last updated 2026-05-16. Drawn from 2 institutional references.
Read this module with the main open the osaka city profile and the read the scoring methodology page so single-topic pages do not hide tradeoffs across dimensions.
Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation. Verified datasets are being integrated; official sources should be used for critical decisions.
2 institutional references inform this view, listed below with reliability notes. Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation; verified datasets are being integrated and official sources should be used for critical decisions.
Used as a directional benchmark for relative city safety framing.
Used as a policy and methodology reference for urban exposure and resilience signals.
These links connect module pages back to city, ranking, and sibling topic paths with crawlable href values.
Return to the complete Osaka profile with all module scores and source context.
Affordability, essential costs, and day-to-day financial pressure for residents.
Health-oriented air-quality conditions with context from WHO, EEA, and EPA benchmarks.
Clean-energy readiness, grid resilience, and solar or efficiency opportunity signals.
Broadband and mobile connectivity quality, latency, and digital-readiness signals for residents and remote workers.
Climate exposure, hazard frequency, and adaptation context for floods, heat, storms, and wildfires.
A balanced ranking of cities across affordability, air quality, clean-energy readiness, and resilience.
Cities that combine strong services, mobility, safety, clean air, and resilience into a healthy day-to-day profile.