Module profile
Safety score
64/100
Personal safety, institutional trust, and resilience signals informed by international safety and crime data.
Safety in Lima64/100
Safety
Safety in Lima
Lima has mid-tier safety with neighborhood variation and property-related opportunistic risks the main day-to-day concern. Safety in Lima scores 64/100, placing it in the developing group of the indexed set.
- Last updated
- 2026-05-16
- Data year
- 2025
- Module score
- 64/100
Safety score
64/100
Mid-tier score with neighborhood-level variation.
Violent-crime context
Mid
Violent-crime context varies meaningfully by district.
Watch item
Property
Property crime is the main practical day-to-day concern.
Lima safety data table
This HTML table mirrors the visible score cards so important comparison data is never trapped in a browser-only chart.
| Metric | Value | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Safety score | 64/100 | Resident experience varies across districts. |
| Violent-crime context | Mid | Trend visibility is supported by public reporting. |
| Watch item | Property | Common-sense precautions remain useful. |
Safety city comparison
A crawlable comparison across a selection of same-country and top-scoring cities. The complete set is reachable via the rankings, the cities index, and each city profile.
| City | Score | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Lima (this page) | 64/100 | Lima has mid-tier safety with neighborhood variation and property-related opportunistic risks the main day-to-day concern. |
| Pisco | 62/100 | Pisco's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Chiclayo | 61/100 | Chiclayo's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Piura | 61/100 | Piura's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Puno | 61/100 | Puno's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Huacho | 61/100 | Huacho's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Tumbes | 61/100 | Tumbes's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Cusco | 60/100 | Cusco's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Callao | 60/100 | Callao's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Pucallpa | 60/100 | Pucallpa's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Huancayo | 59/100 | Huancayo's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Tacna | 59/100 | Tacna's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Ica | 59/100 | Ica's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Chimbote | 59/100 | Chimbote's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Ayacucho | 59/100 | Ayacucho's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Trujillo | 58/100 | Trujillo's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Juliaca | 58/100 | Juliaca's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Tarapoto | 58/100 | Tarapoto's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Sullana | 58/100 | Sullana's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Abancay | 58/100 | Abancay's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Arequipa | 57/100 | Arequipa's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Iquitos | 57/100 | Iquitos's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Cajamarca | 57/100 | Cajamarca's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Huánuco | 57/100 | Huánuco's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Huaraz | 56/100 | Huaraz's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Puerto Maldonado | 56/100 | Puerto Maldonado's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Singapore | 95/100 | Singapore is among the safest cities globally, with very low violent-crime context and strong institutional response. |
| Tokyo | 93/100 | Tokyo scores at the very top globally on safety, with very low violent-crime context, strong institutions, and high resident perception of safety. |
| Kyoto | 93/100 | Kyoto scores very high on safety, with stable institutional response and steady public-safety perception. |
| Copenhagen | 92/100 | Copenhagen scores high on safety due to strong public trust, low violent-crime context, and reliable institutional response. |
| Osaka | 92/100 | Osaka scores high on safety, with strong institutional response and steady public-safety perception. |
Interpretation
Safety scoring weighs violent-crime context, neighborhood variation, and institutional response. Lima shows variation across the metro. Across the indexed cities the safety average is 70/100, so Lima is 6 points below the median. Data year 2025; last updated 2026-05-16. Drawn from 2 institutional references.
Read this module with the main open the lima city profile and the read the scoring methodology page so single-topic pages do not hide tradeoffs across dimensions.
Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation. Verified datasets are being integrated; official sources should be used for critical decisions.
Sources
2 institutional references inform this view, listed below with reliability notes. Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation; verified datasets are being integrated and official sources should be used for critical decisions.
- United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime: UNODC Data Portal
Used as a directional benchmark for relative city safety framing.
- UN-Habitat: World Cities Report 2024
Used as a policy and methodology reference for urban exposure and resilience signals.
Continue exploring
These links connect module pages back to city, ranking, and sibling topic paths with crawlable href values.
Lima city profile
Return to the complete Lima profile with all module scores and source context.
Cost of Living in Lima
Affordability, essential costs, and day-to-day financial pressure for residents.
Air Quality in Lima
Health-oriented air-quality conditions with context from WHO, EEA, and EPA benchmarks.
Energy in Lima
Clean-energy readiness, grid resilience, and solar or efficiency opportunity signals.
Internet Speed in Lima
Broadband and mobile connectivity quality, latency, and digital-readiness signals for residents and remote workers.
Climate Risk in Lima
Climate exposure, hazard frequency, and adaptation context for floods, heat, storms, and wildfires.
Overall Intelligence
A balanced ranking of cities across affordability, air quality, clean-energy readiness, and resilience.
Quality of Life
Cities that combine strong services, mobility, safety, clean air, and resilience into a healthy day-to-day profile.