Safety score
Personal safety, institutional trust, and resilience signals informed by international safety and crime data.
Safety in Prague88/100
Safety
Safety in Prague
Prague is among the safer European capitals, with low violent-crime context and consistent neighborhood experience. Safety in Prague scores 88/100, placing it in the strong group of the indexed set.
- Last updated
- 2026-05-16
- Data year
- 2025
- Module score
- 88/100
Safety score
88/100
Strong score across most central districts.
Violent-crime context
Low
Violent-crime context is comparatively low globally.
Watch item
Pickpocketing
Tourist-area opportunistic risks are the practical concern.
Prague safety data table
This HTML table mirrors the visible score cards so important comparison data is never trapped in a browser-only chart.
| Metric | Value | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Safety score | 88/100 | Stable institutional response reinforces the score. |
| Violent-crime context | Low | Long-run stability supports daily life. |
| Watch item | Pickpocketing | Common-sense precautions remain useful. |
Safety city comparison
A crawlable comparison across a selection of same-country and top-scoring cities. The complete set is reachable via the rankings, the cities index, and each city profile.
| City | Score | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Prague (this page) | 88/100 | Prague is among the safer European capitals, with low violent-crime context and consistent neighborhood experience. |
| Brno | 74/100 | Brno's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Hradec Králové | 72/100 | Hradec Králové's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Plzeň | 69/100 | Plzeň's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Ostrava | 69/100 | Ostrava's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Pardubice | 68/100 | Pardubice's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Zlín | 68/100 | Zlín's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Opava | 68/100 | Opava's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Most | 67/100 | Most's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Mladá Boleslav | 67/100 | Mladá Boleslav's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Kladno | 66/100 | Kladno's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Havířov | 66/100 | Havířov's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Frýdek-Místek | 66/100 | Frýdek-Místek's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Karviná | 65/100 | Karviná's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Chomutov | 65/100 | Chomutov's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Teplice | 64/100 | Teplice's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Ústí nad Labem | 63/100 | Ústí nad Labem's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Jihlava | 57/100 | Jihlava's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Decin | 56/100 | Decin's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Olomouc | 50/100 | Olomouc's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Karlovy Vary | 50/100 | Karlovy Vary's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Liberec | 50/100 | Liberec's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| České Budějovice | 50/100 | České Budějovice's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Singapore | 95/100 | Singapore is among the safest cities globally, with very low violent-crime context and strong institutional response. |
| Tokyo | 93/100 | Tokyo scores at the very top globally on safety, with very low violent-crime context, strong institutions, and high resident perception of safety. |
| Kyoto | 93/100 | Kyoto scores very high on safety, with stable institutional response and steady public-safety perception. |
| Copenhagen | 92/100 | Copenhagen scores high on safety due to strong public trust, low violent-crime context, and reliable institutional response. |
| Osaka | 92/100 | Osaka scores high on safety, with strong institutional response and steady public-safety perception. |
| Zurich | 91/100 | Zurich is among the safest large European cities, with very low violent-crime context and strong institutional response. |
| Seoul | 90/100 | Seoul is among the safer large global cities, with low violent-crime context, strong institutional response, and consistent public-space confidence. |
| Taipei | 90/100 | Taipei is among the safer large global cities, with very low violent-crime context and consistent neighborhood experience. |
Interpretation
Safety scoring weighs violent-crime context, neighborhood variation, and institutional response. Prague's resident experience is widely stable. Across the indexed cities the safety average is 64/100, so Prague is 24 points above the median. Data year 2025; last updated 2026-05-16. Drawn from 2 institutional references.
Read this module with the main open the prague city profile and the read the scoring methodology page so single-topic pages do not hide tradeoffs across dimensions.
Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation. Verified datasets are being integrated; official sources should be used for critical decisions.
Sources
2 institutional references inform this view, listed below with reliability notes. Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation; verified datasets are being integrated and official sources should be used for critical decisions.
- United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime: UNODC Data Portal
Used as a directional benchmark for relative city safety framing.
- UN-Habitat: World Cities Report 2024
Used as a policy and methodology reference for urban exposure and resilience signals.
Continue exploring
These links connect module pages back to city, ranking, and sibling topic paths with crawlable href values.
Prague city profile
Return to the complete Prague profile with all module scores and source context.
Cost of Living in Prague
Affordability, essential costs, and day-to-day financial pressure for residents.
Air Quality in Prague
Health-oriented air-quality conditions with context from WHO, EEA, and EPA benchmarks.
Energy in Prague
Clean-energy readiness, grid resilience, and solar or efficiency opportunity signals.
Internet Speed in Prague
Broadband and mobile connectivity quality, latency, and digital-readiness signals for residents and remote workers.
Climate Risk in Prague
Climate exposure, hazard frequency, and adaptation context for floods, heat, storms, and wildfires.
Overall Intelligence
A balanced ranking of cities across affordability, air quality, clean-energy readiness, and resilience.
Quality of Life
Cities that combine strong services, mobility, safety, clean air, and resilience into a healthy day-to-day profile.