Module profile
Safety score
88/100
Personal safety, institutional trust, and resilience signals informed by international safety and crime data.
Safety
Oslo scores well on safety, with strong institutional response and steady public-safety planning. Safety in Oslo scores 88/100, placing it in the strong group of the indexed set.
Module profile
88/100
Personal safety, institutional trust, and resilience signals informed by international safety and crime data.
88/100
Healthy directional score; opportunistic risks vary by district.
Strong
Day-to-day perception is positive across most districts.
Property crime
Property-related opportunistic risks remain the practical pain point.
This HTML table mirrors the visible score cards so important comparison data is never trapped in a browser-only chart.
| Metric | Value | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Safety score | 88/100 | Stable institutional response supports the score. |
| Resident perception | Strong | Outer-district variation shapes local experience. |
| Watch item | Property crime | Common-sense precautions are still useful. |
A crawlable comparison across a selection of same-country and top-scoring cities. The complete set is reachable via the rankings, the cities index, and each city profile.
| City | Score | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Oslo (this page) | 88/100 | Oslo scores well on safety, with strong institutional response and steady public-safety planning. |
| Eidsvoll Municipality | 86/100 | Eidsvoll Municipality's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Gjøvik Municipality | 85/100 | Gjøvik Municipality's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Egersund | 85/100 | Egersund's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Tromsø Municipality | 84/100 | Tromsø Municipality's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Alta | 84/100 | Alta's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Karmøy Municipality | 84/100 | Karmøy Municipality's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Lillehammer | 83/100 | Lillehammer's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Mo i Rana | 83/100 | Mo i Rana's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Bodø | 83/100 | Bodø's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Halden | 83/100 | Halden's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Steinkjer Municipality | 83/100 | Steinkjer Municipality's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Drøbak | 83/100 | Drøbak's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Porsgrunn | 83/100 | Porsgrunn's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Hammerfest | 83/100 | Hammerfest's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Vadsø | 83/100 | Vadsø's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Jessheim | 83/100 | Jessheim's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Drammen | 82/100 | Drammen's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Narvik | 82/100 | Narvik's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Lørenskog | 82/100 | Lørenskog's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Florø | 82/100 | Florø's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Elverum Municipality | 82/100 | Elverum Municipality's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Bærum Municipality | 81/100 | Bærum Municipality's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Molde Municipality | 81/100 | Molde Municipality's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Haugesund Municipality | 81/100 | Haugesund Municipality's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Kristiansund Municipality | 81/100 | Kristiansund Municipality's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Grimstad | 81/100 | Grimstad's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Mosjøen | 81/100 | Mosjøen's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Harstad | 81/100 | Harstad's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Stavanger/Sandnes | 81/100 | Stavanger/Sandnes's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
| Sandvika | 80/100 | Sandvika's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. |
Safety blends violent-crime context, perception, and response capacity rather than a single headline. Across the indexed cities the safety average is 70/100, so Oslo is 18 points above the median. Data year 2025; last updated 2026-05-16. Drawn from 2 institutional references.
Read this module with the main open the oslo city profile and the read the scoring methodology page so single-topic pages do not hide tradeoffs across dimensions.
Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation. Verified datasets are being integrated; official sources should be used for critical decisions.
2 institutional references inform this view, listed below with reliability notes. Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation; verified datasets are being integrated and official sources should be used for critical decisions.
Used as a directional benchmark for relative city safety framing.
Used as a policy and methodology reference for urban exposure and resilience signals.
These links connect module pages back to city, ranking, and sibling topic paths with crawlable href values.
Return to the complete Oslo profile with all module scores and source context.
Affordability, essential costs, and day-to-day financial pressure for residents.
Health-oriented air-quality conditions with context from WHO, EEA, and EPA benchmarks.
Clean-energy readiness, grid resilience, and solar or efficiency opportunity signals.
Broadband and mobile connectivity quality, latency, and digital-readiness signals for residents and remote workers.
Climate exposure, hazard frequency, and adaptation context for floods, heat, storms, and wildfires.
A balanced ranking of cities across affordability, air quality, clean-energy readiness, and resilience.
Cities that combine strong services, mobility, safety, clean air, and resilience into a healthy day-to-day profile.