Global CityIntelligence

Energy

Energy Readiness in Seattle

Seattle operates with a low-carbon electricity baseline led by hydropower, with active building and transport electrification work. Energy in Seattle scores 90/100, placing it in the leading group of the indexed set.

Last updated
2026-05-16
Data year
2025
Module score
90/100

Energy score

Clean-energy readiness, grid resilience, and solar or efficiency opportunity signals.

Energy in Seattle90/100

Energy readiness

90/100

Very strong baseline supported by hydropower.

Primary transition lever

Buildings and transport

Building electrification and EV adoption are the main levers.

Climate stressor

Rainfall and heat

Atmospheric-river rainfall and rising heat shape adaptation work.

Seattle energy data table

This HTML table mirrors the visible score cards so important comparison data is never trapped in a browser-only chart.

Seattle Energy data table
MetricValueContext
Energy readiness90/100Regional grid is among the lowest-carbon nationally.
Primary transition leverBuildings and transportHeat-pump uptake is rising.
Climate stressorRainfall and heatWildfire smoke drives seasonal pressure.

Energy city comparison

A crawlable comparison across a selection of same-country and top-scoring cities. The complete set is reachable via the rankings, the cities index, and each city profile.

Energy city comparison table
CityScoreSummary
Seattle (this page)90/100Seattle operates with a low-carbon electricity baseline led by hydropower, with active building and transport electrification work.
San Francisco86/100San Francisco operates with active climate policy, a comparatively low-carbon grid, and strong building-efficiency programs.
New York82/100New York has serious clean-energy ambition and infrastructure complexity, with resilience shaped by coastal risk and dense demand.
Saint Paul81/100Saint Paul's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context.
Chandler81/100Chandler's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context.
Irvine81/100Irvine's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context.
Fremont81/100Fremont's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context.
San Bernardino81/100San Bernardino's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context.
Los Angeles80/100Los Angeles benefits from strong solar resource, ambitious state-level transition policy, and active building and transport electrification.
Irving80/100Irving's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context.
Santa Clarita80/100Santa Clarita's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context.
Scottsdale79/100Scottsdale's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context.
Santa Ana79/100Santa Ana's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context.
Oyster Bay79/100Oyster Bay's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context.
Portland78/100Portland's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context.
Plano78/100Plano's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context.
Conroe78/100Conroe's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context.
Laredo77/100Laredo's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context.
Garland77/100Garland's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context.
Bloomington77/100Bloomington's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context.
Chicago76/100Chicago has solid grid reliability with strong wind resource in the region and growing building-efficiency activity.
Denver76/100Denver's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context.
Phoenix76/100Phoenix's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context.
San Diego76/100San Diego's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context.
Glendale75/100Glendale's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context.
San Jose74/100San Jose's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context.
Tacoma74/100Tacoma's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context.
Boston74/100Boston's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context.
Minneapolis74/100Minneapolis's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context.
Boulder74/100Boulder's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context.
Henderson74/100Henderson's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context.

Interpretation

Energy readiness scoring weighs grid carbon intensity, building efficiency, and adaptation. The Pacific-Northwest hydro mix gives a structural advantage. Across the indexed cities the energy average is 64/100, so Seattle is 26 points above the median. Data year 2025; last updated 2026-05-16. Drawn from 3 institutional references.

Read this module with the main open the seattle city profile and the read the scoring methodology page so single-topic pages do not hide tradeoffs across dimensions.

Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation. Verified datasets are being integrated; official sources should be used for critical decisions.

Sources

3 institutional references inform this view, listed below with reliability notes. Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation; verified datasets are being integrated and official sources should be used for critical decisions.

Continue exploring

These links connect module pages back to city, ranking, and sibling topic paths with crawlable href values.

Seattle city profile

Return to the complete Seattle profile with all module scores and source context.

Safety in Seattle

Personal safety, institutional trust, and resilience signals informed by international safety and crime data.

Internet Speed in Seattle

Broadband and mobile connectivity quality, latency, and digital-readiness signals for residents and remote workers.

Climate Risk in Seattle

Climate exposure, hazard frequency, and adaptation context for floods, heat, storms, and wildfires.

Overall Intelligence

A balanced ranking of cities across affordability, air quality, clean-energy readiness, and resilience.

Quality of Life

Cities that combine strong services, mobility, safety, clean air, and resilience into a healthy day-to-day profile.