Climate Risk score
Climate exposure, hazard frequency, and adaptation context for floods, heat, storms, and wildfires.
Climate Risk
Seattle faces moderate climate exposure from heat, atmospheric-river rainfall, and seasonal wildfire smoke, balanced by active adaptation. Climate Risk in Seattle scores 76/100, placing it in the solid group of the indexed set.
Climate exposure, hazard frequency, and adaptation context for floods, heat, storms, and wildfires.
Heat and rainfall
Rising heat and atmospheric-river rainfall are the main hazards.
Moderate
Surface and coastal flood pressure rises in storm cycles.
Strong
State and city programs support resilience.
This HTML table mirrors the visible score cards so important comparison data is never trapped in a browser-only chart.
| Metric | Value | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Primary hazard | Heat and rainfall | Wildfire smoke drives seasonal pressure. |
| Flood exposure | Moderate | Drainage programs are central. |
| Adaptation capacity | Strong | Implementation depth supports the score. |
A crawlable comparison across a selection of same-country and top-scoring cities. The complete set is reachable via the rankings, the cities index, and each city profile.
| City | Score | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Seattle (this page) | 76/100 | Seattle faces moderate climate exposure from heat, atmospheric-river rainfall, and seasonal wildfire smoke, balanced by active adaptation. |
| Chicago | 76/100 | Chicago carries moderate climate exposure from heat, intense rainfall, and lakefront stormwater pressure, balanced by active adaptation. |
| Washington DC | 76/100 | Washington DC's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Plano | 76/100 | Plano's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Scottsdale | 76/100 | Scottsdale's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Laredo | 76/100 | Laredo's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Fremont | 76/100 | Fremont's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Conroe | 76/100 | Conroe's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Boston | 75/100 | Boston's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Chula Vista | 75/100 | Chula Vista's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Glendale | 75/100 | Glendale's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Bloomington | 75/100 | Bloomington's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Minneapolis | 74/100 | Minneapolis's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Madison | 74/100 | Madison's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| North Las Vegas | 74/100 | North Las Vegas's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Santa Clarita | 74/100 | Santa Clarita's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Santa Ana | 73/100 | Santa Ana's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Irvine | 73/100 | Irvine's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Philadelphia | 72/100 | Philadelphia's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Denver | 72/100 | Denver's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| San Diego | 72/100 | San Diego's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Portland | 72/100 | Portland's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Raleigh | 72/100 | Raleigh's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Pittsburgh | 72/100 | Pittsburgh's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Gilbert | 72/100 | Gilbert's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Chandler | 71/100 | Chandler's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Irving | 71/100 | Irving's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Oyster Bay | 71/100 | Oyster Bay's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Nashville | 70/100 | Nashville's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Charlotte | 70/100 | Charlotte's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Salt Lake City | 70/100 | Salt Lake City's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
Climate-risk scoring weighs hazard exposure with adaptation capacity. Seattle's main pressures are heat and rainfall. Across the indexed cities the climate risk average is 62/100, so Seattle is 14 points above the median. Data year 2025; last updated 2026-05-16. Drawn from 3 institutional references.
Read this module with the main open the seattle city profile and the read the scoring methodology page so single-topic pages do not hide tradeoffs across dimensions.
Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation. Verified datasets are being integrated; official sources should be used for critical decisions.
3 institutional references inform this view, listed below with reliability notes. Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation; verified datasets are being integrated and official sources should be used for critical decisions.
Used to explain urban climate vulnerability and adaptation scoring logic.
Used as an energy-resource and weather-normalization reference.
Used as a policy and methodology reference for urban exposure and resilience signals.
These links connect module pages back to city, ranking, and sibling topic paths with crawlable href values.
Return to the complete Seattle profile with all module scores and source context.
Affordability, essential costs, and day-to-day financial pressure for residents.
Health-oriented air-quality conditions with context from WHO, EEA, and EPA benchmarks.
Clean-energy readiness, grid resilience, and solar or efficiency opportunity signals.
Personal safety, institutional trust, and resilience signals informed by international safety and crime data.
Broadband and mobile connectivity quality, latency, and digital-readiness signals for residents and remote workers.
A balanced ranking of cities across affordability, air quality, clean-energy readiness, and resilience.
Cities that combine strong services, mobility, safety, clean air, and resilience into a healthy day-to-day profile.