Module profile
Energy module indicator (modelled)
60/100
Clean-energy readiness, grid resilience, and solar or efficiency opportunity signals.
Energy in Durham60/100
Energy
Energy Readiness in Durham
GCI modelled/editorial indicators, not measured city statistics. Durham's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. Energy in Durham scores 60/100, placing it in the developing group of the indexed set.
- Last updated
- 2026-10-17
- Data year (model edition)
- 2025
- Module score
- 60/100
What these numbers represent
GCI scores and planning amounts are modelled or editorial indicators, not measured city statistics or official estimates. Country assumptions are not local observations. Institutional references explain context; they do not supply these scores.
Source-backed temperature context is available in the NASA POWER climate reference. It is gridded reanalysis, not a weather-station measurement, and does not validate GCI's other scores.
Content and provenance reviewed 2026-10-17; this is not a new observation date. For GCI models, data year means model edition, not a measurement period. Source-backed datasets state their own periods. Read the data categories and limitations.
Transition framing
Directional indicator
Energy framing combines national policy context, infrastructure maturity, and adaptation capacity into a directional readiness signal.
Resource context
Structured benchmark context
Renewable-resource availability is interpreted against published references rather than a single index value.
Verified local dataset
Pending integration
Source-backed energy metrics will appear when the platform integrates verified city-level data.
Durham energy data table
This HTML table mirrors the visible score cards so important comparison data is never trapped in a browser-only chart.
| Metric | Value | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Transition framing | Directional indicator | Use this section as context, not an official measurement. |
| Resource context | Structured benchmark context | See the methodology page for how the directional score is constructed. |
| Verified local dataset | Pending integration | Transparent fallback is shown until then. |
Energy city comparison
A crawlable comparison across a selection of same-country and top-scoring cities. The complete set is reachable via the rankings, the cities index, and each city profile.
| City | Modelled module score | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Durham (this page) | 60/100 | Durham's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Seattle | 90/100 | Seattle operates with a low-carbon electricity baseline led by hydropower, with active building and transport electrification work. |
| San Francisco | 86/100 | San Francisco operates with active climate policy, a comparatively low-carbon grid, and strong building-efficiency programs. |
| New York | 82/100 | New York has serious clean-energy ambition and infrastructure complexity, with resilience shaped by coastal risk and dense demand. |
| Fullerton | 82/100 | Fullerton's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Thornton | 82/100 | Thornton's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Miramar | 82/100 | Miramar's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Abilene | 82/100 | Abilene's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Arvada | 82/100 | Arvada's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Berkeley | 82/100 | Berkeley's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Antioch | 82/100 | Antioch's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Beaumont | 82/100 | Beaumont's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| High Point | 82/100 | High Point's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Centennial | 82/100 | Centennial's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Sandy Springs | 82/100 | Sandy Springs's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Hillsboro | 82/100 | Hillsboro's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Little Rock | 82/100 | Little Rock's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Tuscaloosa | 82/100 | Tuscaloosa's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Edinburg | 82/100 | Edinburg's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Sioux City | 82/100 | Sioux City's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Newport News | 82/100 | Newport News's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Charlottesville | 82/100 | Charlottesville's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Council Bluffs | 82/100 | Council Bluffs's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| La Crosse | 82/100 | La Crosse's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| El Centro | 82/100 | El Centro's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Medford | 82/100 | Medford's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Pontiac | 82/100 | Pontiac's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Garden Grove | 82/100 | Garden Grove's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Lawton | 82/100 | Lawton's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Franklin | 82/100 | Franklin's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Caldwell | 82/100 | Caldwell's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
Interpretation
The energy module uses a legacy editorial seed indicator. Its score is not calculated from a retrieved local measurement series. Related institutional links explain context, not the numeric result. Across the indexed cities the energy average is 71/100, so Durham is 11 points below the median. These comparisons use GCI modelled/editorial scores, not official measurements. Content reviewed 2026-10-17; model edition 2025, not an observation year.
Read this module with the main open the durham city profile and the read the scoring methodology page so single-topic pages do not hide tradeoffs across dimensions.
Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation. Verified datasets are being integrated; official sources should be used for critical decisions.
Methodology references
These publications provide background context, not the underlying city values or an endorsement of GCI scores. Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation; verified datasets are being integrated and official sources should be used for critical decisions.
- UN-Habitat: World Cities Report 2024
Background reference only. Do not attribute the modelled city scores to this publisher.
- US Environmental Protection Agency: National Ambient Air Quality Standards
Background reference only. Do not attribute the modelled city scores to this publisher.
- NASA: NASA POWER
Background reference only. Do not attribute the modelled city scores to this publisher.
- IPCC: AR6 WGII Chapter 6: Cities, settlements and key infrastructure
Background reference only. Do not attribute the modelled city scores to this publisher.
Continue exploring
These links connect module pages back to city, ranking, and sibling topic paths with crawlable href values.
Durham city profile
Return to the complete Durham profile with all module scores and source context.
Cost of Living in Durham
Affordability, essential costs, and day-to-day financial pressure for residents.
Air Quality in Durham
Health-oriented air-quality conditions with context from WHO, EEA, and EPA benchmarks.
Safety in Durham
Personal safety, institutional trust, and resilience signals informed by international safety and crime data.
Internet Speed in Durham
Broadband and mobile connectivity quality, latency, and digital-readiness signals for residents and remote workers.
Climate Risk in Durham
Climate exposure, hazard frequency, and adaptation context for floods, heat, storms, and wildfires.
Overall Intelligence
A balanced ranking of cities across affordability, air quality, clean-energy readiness, and resilience.
Quality of Life
Cities that combine strong services, mobility, safety, clean air, and resilience into a healthy day-to-day profile.