Global CityIntelligence

Safety

Safety in Ahmedabad

Ahmedabad's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available. Safety in Ahmedabad scores 60/100, placing it in the developing group of the indexed set.

Last updated
2026-05-16
Data year
2025
Module score
60/100

Module profile

Safety score

60/100

Personal safety, institutional trust, and resilience signals informed by international safety and crime data.

Safety in Ahmedabad60/100

Safety framing

Directional indicator

Safety framing blends violent-crime context, resident perception, and institutional response capacity into a directional orientation.

Verified utility layer

See country emergency profile

Verified country-level emergency contacts attach via the country hub where official publishers have been integrated.

Verified local dataset

Pending integration

Source-backed safety metrics will appear when the platform integrates verified city-level data.

Ahmedabad safety data table

This HTML table mirrors the visible score cards so important comparison data is never trapped in a browser-only chart.

Ahmedabad Safety data table
MetricValueContext
Safety framingDirectional indicatorUse this section as context, not an official measurement.
Verified utility layerSee country emergency profileWhere no verified profile exists, the platform shows a transparent fallback rather than guessed values.
Verified local datasetPending integrationTransparent fallback is shown until then.

Safety city comparison

A crawlable comparison across a selection of same-country and top-scoring cities. The complete set is reachable via the rankings, the cities index, and each city profile.

Safety city comparison table
CityScoreSummary
Ahmedabad (this page)60/100Ahmedabad's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
Bangalore78/100Bangalore scores well on safety, with steady public-safety perception and stable institutional response.
Mumbai76/100Mumbai has solid overall safety with consistent neighborhood experience and property-related opportunistic risks the main day-to-day concern.
Delhi70/100Delhi scores moderately on safety, with district-level variation and active institutional response.
Lucknow65/100Lucknow's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
Chandigarh65/100Chandigarh's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
Amritsar65/100Amritsar's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
Nagpur65/100Nagpur's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
Bhubaneswar65/100Bhubaneswar's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
Thiruvananthapuram64/100Thiruvananthapuram's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
Madurai64/100Madurai's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
Prayagraj63/100Prayagraj's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
Chennai62/100Chennai's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
Hyderabad62/100Hyderabad's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
Pune62/100Pune's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
New Delhi62/100New Delhi's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
Varanasi62/100Varanasi's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
Patna62/100Patna's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
Bhopal62/100Bhopal's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
Ranchi62/100Ranchi's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
Visakhapatnam62/100Visakhapatnam's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
Kolkata61/100Kolkata's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
Surat61/100Surat's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
Vadodara61/100Vadodara's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
Indore60/100Indore's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
Jaipur59/100Jaipur's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
Agra58/100Agra's safety profile is a directional indicator; verified country-level emergency profiles attach via the country hub where available.
Singapore95/100Singapore is among the safest cities globally, with very low violent-crime context and strong institutional response.
Tokyo93/100Tokyo scores at the very top globally on safety, with very low violent-crime context, strong institutions, and high resident perception of safety.
Kyoto93/100Kyoto scores very high on safety, with stable institutional response and steady public-safety perception.
Copenhagen92/100Copenhagen scores high on safety due to strong public trust, low violent-crime context, and reliable institutional response.

Interpretation

Safety scoring blends violent-crime context, perceived safety, and institutional response capacity. Verified country emergency profiles attach where available. Across the indexed cities the safety average is 70/100, so Ahmedabad is 10 points below the median. Data year 2025; last updated 2026-05-16. Drawn from 4 institutional references.

Read this module with the main open the ahmedabad city profile and the read the scoring methodology page so single-topic pages do not hide tradeoffs across dimensions.

Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation. Verified datasets are being integrated; official sources should be used for critical decisions.

Sources

4 institutional references inform this view, listed below with reliability notes. Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation; verified datasets are being integrated and official sources should be used for critical decisions.

Continue exploring

These links connect module pages back to city, ranking, and sibling topic paths with crawlable href values.

Energy in Ahmedabad

Clean-energy readiness, grid resilience, and solar or efficiency opportunity signals.

Internet Speed in Ahmedabad

Broadband and mobile connectivity quality, latency, and digital-readiness signals for residents and remote workers.

Overall Intelligence

A balanced ranking of cities across affordability, air quality, clean-energy readiness, and resilience.

Quality of Life

Cities that combine strong services, mobility, safety, clean air, and resilience into a healthy day-to-day profile.