Internet Speed score
Broadband and mobile connectivity quality, latency, and digital-readiness signals for residents and remote workers.
Internet Speed in Shreveport55/100
Internet Speed
Internet Speed in Shreveport
Shreveport's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. Internet Speed in Shreveport scores 55/100, placing it in the early-stage group of the indexed set.
- Last updated
- 2026-05-16
- Data year
- 2025
- Module score
- 55/100
Connectivity framing
Directional indicator
Connectivity framing combines national digital-readiness context with widely cited fixed and mobile reference benchmarks.
Coverage context
Structured benchmark context
Fixed and mobile coverage are interpreted against published references rather than a single household-level measurement.
Verified local dataset
Pending integration
Source-backed connectivity metrics will appear when the platform integrates verified city-level data.
Shreveport internet speed data table
This HTML table mirrors the visible score cards so important comparison data is never trapped in a browser-only chart.
| Metric | Value | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity framing | Directional indicator | Use this section as context, not an official measurement. |
| Coverage context | Structured benchmark context | See the methodology page for how the directional score is constructed. |
| Verified local dataset | Pending integration | Transparent fallback is shown until then. |
Internet Speed city comparison
A crawlable comparison across a selection of same-country and top-scoring cities. The complete set is reachable via the rankings, the cities index, and each city profile.
| City | Score | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Shreveport (this page) | 55/100 | Shreveport's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| San Francisco | 90/100 | San Francisco has very fast fiber broadband and dense mobile coverage, supporting a deep technology and remote-work ecosystem. |
| Seattle | 90/100 | Seattle delivers fast fiber broadband and reliable mobile coverage, supporting a deep technology and remote-work community. |
| Los Angeles | 88/100 | Los Angeles delivers fast fiber broadband and dense mobile coverage, supporting media production and a large remote-work community. |
| Chicago | 88/100 | Chicago delivers fast fiber broadband and reliable mobile coverage, supporting financial services and a growing tech sector. |
| New York | 86/100 | New York has fast broadband and dense mobile coverage, supporting remote work, financial services, and creative industries. |
| Portland | 79/100 | Portland's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| San Diego | 78/100 | San Diego's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| Boston | 77/100 | Boston's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| Denver | 77/100 | Denver's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| Washington DC | 75/100 | Washington DC's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| Minneapolis | 75/100 | Minneapolis's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| Boulder | 75/100 | Boulder's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| Philadelphia | 74/100 | Philadelphia's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| Phoenix | 74/100 | Phoenix's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| Raleigh | 74/100 | Raleigh's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| Madison | 74/100 | Madison's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| Austin | 73/100 | Austin's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| Salt Lake City | 73/100 | Salt Lake City's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| Atlanta | 72/100 | Atlanta's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| Nashville | 72/100 | Nashville's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| Charlotte | 72/100 | Charlotte's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| Pittsburgh | 72/100 | Pittsburgh's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| Miami | 71/100 | Miami's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| Dallas | 71/100 | Dallas's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| Tampa | 71/100 | Tampa's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| Orlando | 71/100 | Orlando's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| Houston | 71/100 | Houston's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| Columbus | 71/100 | Columbus's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| Sacramento | 71/100 | Sacramento's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
| San Jose | 70/100 | San Jose's connectivity profile is a directional indicator combining national digital-readiness context with widely cited speed-test references. |
Interpretation
Internet-speed scoring weighs fixed broadband, mobile network performance, latency, and digital-readiness context for households and remote workers. Across the indexed cities the internet speed average is 63/100, so Shreveport is 8 points below the median. Data year 2025; last updated 2026-05-16. Drawn from 4 institutional references.
Read this module with the main open the shreveport city profile and the read the scoring methodology page so single-topic pages do not hide tradeoffs across dimensions.
Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation. Verified datasets are being integrated; official sources should be used for critical decisions.
Sources
4 institutional references inform this view, listed below with reliability notes. Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation; verified datasets are being integrated and official sources should be used for critical decisions.
- UN-Habitat: World Cities Report 2024
Used as a policy and methodology reference for urban exposure and resilience signals.
- US Environmental Protection Agency: National Ambient Air Quality Standards
Used where United States city comparisons need air-quality benchmark context.
- NASA: NASA POWER
Used as an energy-resource and weather-normalization reference.
- IPCC: AR6 WGII Chapter 6: Cities, settlements and key infrastructure
Used to explain urban climate vulnerability and adaptation scoring logic.
Continue exploring
These links connect module pages back to city, ranking, and sibling topic paths with crawlable href values.
Shreveport city profile
Return to the complete Shreveport profile with all module scores and source context.
Cost of Living in Shreveport
Affordability, essential costs, and day-to-day financial pressure for residents.
Air Quality in Shreveport
Health-oriented air-quality conditions with context from WHO, EEA, and EPA benchmarks.
Energy in Shreveport
Clean-energy readiness, grid resilience, and solar or efficiency opportunity signals.
Safety in Shreveport
Personal safety, institutional trust, and resilience signals informed by international safety and crime data.
Climate Risk in Shreveport
Climate exposure, hazard frequency, and adaptation context for floods, heat, storms, and wildfires.
Overall Intelligence
A balanced ranking of cities across affordability, air quality, clean-energy readiness, and resilience.
Quality of Life
Cities that combine strong services, mobility, safety, clean air, and resilience into a healthy day-to-day profile.