GCIGlobal City Intelligence
Climate Risk

Climate Risk in Nairobi

Nairobi faces meaningful climate exposure from rainfall variability, drought cycles, and rising heat, balanced by active adaptation work. Climate Risk in Nairobi scores 68/100, placing it in the developing group of the indexed set.

Last updated
2026-05-05
Data year
2025
Module score
68/100

Climate Risk score

Climate exposure, hazard frequency, and adaptation context for floods, heat, storms, and wildfires.

Climate Risk in Nairobi68/100

Primary hazard

Rainfall and drought

Rainfall variability and drought cycles are the main hazards.

Flood exposure

Moderate

Surface flooding pressure rises in the rainy season.

Adaptation capacity

Improving

Climate plans and water programs build resilience.

Nairobi climate risk data table

This HTML table mirrors the visible score cards so important comparison data is never trapped in a browser-only chart.

Nairobi Climate Risk data table
MetricValueContext
Primary hazardRainfall and droughtConcurrent hazards shape adaptation work.
Flood exposureModerateDrainage programs are central.
Adaptation capacityImprovingImplementation timelines extend into the medium term.

Climate Risk city comparison

A crawlable comparison across every indexed city makes it easy to scan how this module changes between metros.

Climate Risk city comparison table
CityScoreSummary
Nairobi (this page)68/100Nairobi faces meaningful climate exposure from rainfall variability, drought cycles, and rising heat, balanced by active adaptation work.
Zurich80/100Zurich's climate-risk profile is comparatively low, shaped mainly by heat waves and Alpine-runoff variability.
Copenhagen78/100Copenhagen carries moderate climate risk centered on coastal flooding and heavy-rain stormwater pressure, with strong adaptation planning.
Vienna78/100Vienna faces moderate climate exposure focused on heat waves and Danube flood scenarios, balanced by active adaptation programs.
Amsterdam76/100Amsterdam's climate-risk profile is shaped by sea-level pressure and rainfall intensity, balanced by world-class water management.
Berlin75/100Berlin faces moderate climate exposure focused on heat waves, surface-water flooding, and drought-pressure on green infrastructure.
London72/100London faces moderate climate exposure shaped by heat waves, Thames flood scenarios, and urban surface-water flooding.
Paris70/100Paris carries moderate climate risk centered on heat waves and Seine flood pressure, with active adaptation programs.
Toronto70/100Toronto faces rising heat, severe-storm, and wildfire-smoke pressure, balanced by solid adaptation programs.
Seoul70/100Seoul faces meaningful climate exposure from heat, intense rainfall, and storm pressure, balanced by strong adaptation capacity.
Auckland70/100Auckland faces moderate climate exposure from storms, intense rainfall, and rising sea-level pressure, balanced by active adaptation programs.
Barcelona68/100Barcelona faces rising heat and water-stress pressure, balanced by active adaptation programs and regional planning depth.
São Paulo66/100São Paulo faces meaningful climate exposure from heat, intense rainfall, and water-cycle variability, balanced by active adaptation work.
Cape Town66/100Cape Town faces meaningful climate exposure from drought, heat, and wildfire pressure, balanced by active adaptation programs.
Singapore65/100Singapore faces meaningful climate exposure from heat, intense rainfall, and long-run sea-level pressure, balanced by very strong adaptation capacity.
Sydney65/100Sydney faces meaningful climate exposure from heat, bushfire-smoke, and storm pressure, with improving adaptation programs.
San Francisco65/100San Francisco faces concurrent climate exposure from wildfire-smoke, heat, sea-level pressure, and seismic risk, balanced by strong adaptation work.
Tokyo64/100Tokyo faces meaningful climate exposure across heat, storm, and seismic-coupled flood pressure, balanced by strong adaptation capacity.
Hong Kong64/100Hong Kong faces meaningful climate exposure from typhoons, heat, and coastal pressure, balanced by strong engineering capacity.
Mexico City62/100Mexico City faces meaningful climate exposure centered on water scarcity, subsidence, and rising heat, balanced by long-running adaptation programs.
New York60/100New York faces meaningful coastal flood, heat, and storm exposure. Adaptation investment is significant but not yet at parity with the hazard.
Dubai60/100Dubai faces meaningful climate exposure from sustained heat and water-resource constraints, balanced by active adaptation and infrastructure investment.
Bangkok56/100Bangkok faces meaningful climate exposure from heat, intense rainfall, and long-run flood and subsidence pressure, balanced by active adaptation work.

Interpretation

Climate-risk scoring weighs hazard exposure with adaptation capacity. Nairobi's hazards are concurrent; programs are scaling up. Across the indexed cities the climate risk average is 68/100, so Nairobi is close to the median for this dimension. Data year 2025; last updated 2026-05-05. Drawn from 3 institutional references.

Read this module with the main open the nairobi city profile and the read the scoring methodology page so single-topic pages do not hide tradeoffs across dimensions.

This page uses a typed sample dataset shaped to demonstrate the indexable content structure. Values are directional and not official measurements.

Sources

3 institutional references inform this view, listed below with reliability notes. Mock values are typed and ready to be replaced by API-backed city datasets without changing route structure.

Continue exploring

These links connect module pages back to city, ranking, and sibling topic paths with crawlable href values.

Nairobi city profile

Return to the complete Nairobi profile with all module scores and source context.

Energy in Nairobi

Clean-energy readiness, grid resilience, and solar or efficiency opportunity signals.

Safety in Nairobi

Personal safety, institutional trust, and resilience signals informed by international safety and crime data.

Internet Speed in Nairobi

Broadband and mobile connectivity quality, latency, and digital-readiness signals for residents and remote workers.

Overall Intelligence

A balanced ranking of cities across affordability, air quality, clean-energy readiness, and resilience.

Quality of Life

Cities that combine strong services, mobility, safety, clean air, and resilience into a healthy day-to-day profile.