Climate Risk score
Climate exposure, hazard frequency, and adaptation context for floods, heat, storms, and wildfires.
Climate Risk
Auckland faces moderate climate exposure from storms, intense rainfall, and rising sea-level pressure, balanced by active adaptation programs. Climate Risk in Auckland scores 70/100, placing it in the solid group of the indexed set.
Climate exposure, hazard frequency, and adaptation context for floods, heat, storms, and wildfires.
Storms and rainfall
Tropical storms and intense rainfall are the main hazards.
Moderate
Surface flooding pressure rises in storm cycles.
Strong
Climate plans and engineering capacity build resilience.
This HTML table mirrors the visible score cards so important comparison data is never trapped in a browser-only chart.
| Metric | Value | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Primary hazard | Storms and rainfall | Concurrent hazards shape adaptation work. |
| Flood exposure | Moderate | Drainage and stormwater programs are central. |
| Adaptation capacity | Strong | Implementation depth supports the score. |
A crawlable comparison across a selection of same-country and top-scoring cities. The complete set is reachable via the rankings, the cities index, and each city profile.
| City | Score | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Auckland (this page) | 70/100 | Auckland faces moderate climate exposure from storms, intense rainfall, and rising sea-level pressure, balanced by active adaptation programs. |
| Wellington | 70/100 | Wellington carries elevated climate risk centered on seismic exposure, coastal storms, and stormwater pressure. |
| Tauranga | 70/100 | Tauranga's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Christchurch | 68/100 | Christchurch's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Dunedin | 68/100 | Dunedin's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Queenstown | 68/100 | Queenstown's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Invercargill | 66/100 | Invercargill's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Napier | 65/100 | Napier's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Lower Hutt | 64/100 | Lower Hutt's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Porirua | 64/100 | Porirua's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Hastings | 63/100 | Hastings's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Blenheim | 62/100 | Blenheim's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Hibiscus Coast | 61/100 | Hibiscus Coast's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Gisborne | 55/100 | Gisborne's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Palmerston North | 50/100 | Palmerston North's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Nelson | 50/100 | Nelson's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Rotorua | 50/100 | Rotorua's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| New Plymouth | 50/100 | New Plymouth's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Whangārei | 50/100 | Whangārei's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Hamilton | 50/100 | Hamilton's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Geneva | 86/100 | Geneva's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Vejle | 84/100 | Vejle's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Oslo | 84/100 | Oslo carries moderate climate risk centered on heavy precipitation and stormwater pressure, with strong adaptation planning. |
| Basel | 84/100 | Basel's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Nanterre | 84/100 | Nanterre's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Vitry-sur-Seine | 84/100 | Vitry-sur-Seine's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Créteil | 84/100 | Créteil's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Vlaardingen | 84/100 | Vlaardingen's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Sandnes | 84/100 | Sandnes's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Blois | 84/100 | Blois's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Nyköping | 84/100 | Nyköping's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
Climate-risk scoring weighs hazard exposure with adaptation capacity. Auckland's hazards are real; institutional capacity supports a healthy score. Across the indexed cities the climate risk average is 62/100, so Auckland is 8 points above the median. Data year 2025; last updated 2026-05-16. Drawn from 3 institutional references.
Read this module with the main open the auckland city profile and the read the scoring methodology page so single-topic pages do not hide tradeoffs across dimensions.
Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation. Verified datasets are being integrated; official sources should be used for critical decisions.
3 institutional references inform this view, listed below with reliability notes. Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation; verified datasets are being integrated and official sources should be used for critical decisions.
Used to explain urban climate vulnerability and adaptation scoring logic.
Used as an energy-resource and weather-normalization reference.
Used as a policy and methodology reference for urban exposure and resilience signals.
These links connect module pages back to city, ranking, and sibling topic paths with crawlable href values.
Return to the complete Auckland profile with all module scores and source context.
Affordability, essential costs, and day-to-day financial pressure for residents.
Health-oriented air-quality conditions with context from WHO, EEA, and EPA benchmarks.
Clean-energy readiness, grid resilience, and solar or efficiency opportunity signals.
Personal safety, institutional trust, and resilience signals informed by international safety and crime data.
Broadband and mobile connectivity quality, latency, and digital-readiness signals for residents and remote workers.
A balanced ranking of cities across affordability, air quality, clean-energy readiness, and resilience.
Cities that combine strong services, mobility, safety, clean air, and resilience into a healthy day-to-day profile.