Energy score
Clean-energy readiness, grid resilience, and solar or efficiency opportunity signals.
Energy
Toronto benefits from a low-carbon Ontario grid and ongoing building-efficiency efforts, with winter heat as a major energy lever. Energy in Toronto scores 82/100, placing it in the strong group of the indexed set.
Clean-energy readiness, grid resilience, and solar or efficiency opportunity signals.
82/100
Low-carbon grid and policy direction support the score.
Heat pumps
Cold-climate heat pumps and retrofits are the main path.
Cold and storms
Winter resilience is central to energy planning.
This HTML table mirrors the visible score cards so important comparison data is never trapped in a browser-only chart.
| Metric | Value | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Energy readiness | 82/100 | Building heat is the main outstanding lever. |
| Primary transition lever | Heat pumps | Winter peak demand shapes infrastructure planning. |
| Climate stressor | Cold and storms | Severe weather events strain distribution networks. |
A crawlable comparison across a selection of same-country and top-scoring cities. The complete set is reachable via the rankings, the cities index, and each city profile.
| City | Score | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Toronto (this page) | 82/100 | Toronto benefits from a low-carbon Ontario grid and ongoing building-efficiency efforts, with winter heat as a major energy lever. |
| Vancouver | 90/100 | Vancouver operates with a low-carbon electricity baseline led by hydropower, with active building and transport electrification work. |
| Laval | 84/100 | Laval's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Longueuil | 84/100 | Longueuil's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Burnaby | 83/100 | Burnaby's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Surrey | 82/100 | Surrey's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Airdrie | 82/100 | Airdrie's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Coquitlam | 81/100 | Coquitlam's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Saguenay | 80/100 | Saguenay's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Mississauga | 80/100 | Mississauga's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Markham | 80/100 | Markham's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Vaughan | 80/100 | Vaughan's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Burlington | 80/100 | Burlington's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Brampton | 79/100 | Brampton's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Delta | 79/100 | Delta's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Trois-Rivières | 78/100 | Trois-Rivières's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Calgary | 78/100 | Calgary's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Lévis | 78/100 | Lévis's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Maple Ridge | 78/100 | Maple Ridge's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Chatham-Kent | 77/100 | Chatham-Kent's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Pickering | 77/100 | Pickering's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Kawartha Lakes | 77/100 | Kawartha Lakes's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Montreal | 76/100 | Montreal's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Ottawa | 76/100 | Ottawa's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Quebec City | 76/100 | Quebec City's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Victoria | 76/100 | Victoria's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Richmond Hill | 75/100 | Richmond Hill's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Terrebonne | 75/100 | Terrebonne's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Lethbridge | 74/100 | Lethbridge's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Dartmouth | 74/100 | Dartmouth's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
| Saint John | 73/100 | Saint John's energy-readiness profile is a directional indicator that combines national policy framing with city-level adaptation context. |
Energy readiness scoring weighs grid resilience and transition strategy. Toronto's grid carbon intensity is low; building heat is the main lever. Across the indexed cities the energy average is 64/100, so Toronto is 18 points above the median. Data year 2025; last updated 2026-05-16. Drawn from 3 institutional references.
Read this module with the main open the toronto city profile and the read the scoring methodology page so single-topic pages do not hide tradeoffs across dimensions.
Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation. Verified datasets are being integrated; official sources should be used for critical decisions.
3 institutional references inform this view, listed below with reliability notes. Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation; verified datasets are being integrated and official sources should be used for critical decisions.
Used as an energy-resource and weather-normalization reference.
Used to explain urban climate vulnerability and adaptation scoring logic.
Used to ground energy-readiness scoring in international transition guidance.
These links connect module pages back to city, ranking, and sibling topic paths with crawlable href values.
Return to the complete Toronto profile with all module scores and source context.
Affordability, essential costs, and day-to-day financial pressure for residents.
Health-oriented air-quality conditions with context from WHO, EEA, and EPA benchmarks.
Personal safety, institutional trust, and resilience signals informed by international safety and crime data.
Broadband and mobile connectivity quality, latency, and digital-readiness signals for residents and remote workers.
Climate exposure, hazard frequency, and adaptation context for floods, heat, storms, and wildfires.
A balanced ranking of cities across affordability, air quality, clean-energy readiness, and resilience.
Cities that combine strong services, mobility, safety, clean air, and resilience into a healthy day-to-day profile.