Climate Risk score
Climate exposure, hazard frequency, and adaptation context for floods, heat, storms, and wildfires.
Climate Risk
Toronto faces rising heat, severe-storm, and wildfire-smoke pressure, balanced by solid adaptation programs. Climate Risk in Toronto scores 70/100, placing it in the solid group of the indexed set.
Climate exposure, hazard frequency, and adaptation context for floods, heat, storms, and wildfires.
Heat and storms
Heat waves and severe storms are the main day-to-day hazards.
Moderate
Stormwater flooding pressure is rising.
Strong
Climate plans and stormwater investment build resilience.
This HTML table mirrors the visible score cards so important comparison data is never trapped in a browser-only chart.
| Metric | Value | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Primary hazard | Heat and storms | Wildfire smoke is an episodic but growing concern. |
| Flood exposure | Moderate | Localized flooding events are increasing. |
| Adaptation capacity | Strong | Implementation timelines extend into the medium term. |
A crawlable comparison across a selection of same-country and top-scoring cities. The complete set is reachable via the rankings, the cities index, and each city profile.
| City | Score | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Toronto (this page) | 70/100 | Toronto faces rising heat, severe-storm, and wildfire-smoke pressure, balanced by solid adaptation programs. |
| Mississauga | 76/100 | Mississauga's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Vancouver | 76/100 | Vancouver faces moderate climate exposure from heat, atmospheric-river rainfall, and seasonal wildfire smoke, balanced by active adaptation. |
| Ottawa | 76/100 | Ottawa's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Quebec City | 76/100 | Quebec City's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Dartmouth | 76/100 | Dartmouth's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Markham | 75/100 | Markham's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Vaughan | 75/100 | Vaughan's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Montreal | 75/100 | Montreal's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Chatham-Kent | 75/100 | Chatham-Kent's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Brampton | 74/100 | Brampton's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Burnaby | 74/100 | Burnaby's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Surrey | 73/100 | Surrey's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Laval | 73/100 | Laval's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Coquitlam | 73/100 | Coquitlam's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Maple Ridge | 73/100 | Maple Ridge's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Longueuil | 72/100 | Longueuil's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Calgary | 72/100 | Calgary's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Victoria | 72/100 | Victoria's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Waterloo | 72/100 | Waterloo's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Burlington | 72/100 | Burlington's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| London | 71/100 | London's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Guelph | 71/100 | Guelph's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Kingston | 71/100 | Kingston's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Lévis | 71/100 | Lévis's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Pickering | 71/100 | Pickering's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Airdrie | 71/100 | Airdrie's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| St. Catharines | 70/100 | St. Catharines's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Oshawa | 70/100 | Oshawa's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Barrie | 70/100 | Barrie's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Saguenay | 70/100 | Saguenay's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
Climate-risk scoring weighs hazard exposure with adaptation capacity. Toronto's hazards are rising; institutional capacity supports a healthy score. Across the indexed cities the climate risk average is 62/100, so Toronto is 8 points above the median. Data year 2025; last updated 2026-05-16. Drawn from 3 institutional references.
Read this module with the main open the toronto city profile and the read the scoring methodology page so single-topic pages do not hide tradeoffs across dimensions.
Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation. Verified datasets are being integrated; official sources should be used for critical decisions.
3 institutional references inform this view, listed below with reliability notes. Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation; verified datasets are being integrated and official sources should be used for critical decisions.
Used to explain urban climate vulnerability and adaptation scoring logic.
Used as an energy-resource and weather-normalization reference.
Used as a policy and methodology reference for urban exposure and resilience signals.
These links connect module pages back to city, ranking, and sibling topic paths with crawlable href values.
Return to the complete Toronto profile with all module scores and source context.
Affordability, essential costs, and day-to-day financial pressure for residents.
Health-oriented air-quality conditions with context from WHO, EEA, and EPA benchmarks.
Clean-energy readiness, grid resilience, and solar or efficiency opportunity signals.
Personal safety, institutional trust, and resilience signals informed by international safety and crime data.
Broadband and mobile connectivity quality, latency, and digital-readiness signals for residents and remote workers.
A balanced ranking of cities across affordability, air quality, clean-energy readiness, and resilience.
Cities that combine strong services, mobility, safety, clean air, and resilience into a healthy day-to-day profile.