Cost of Living score
Affordability, essential costs, and day-to-day financial pressure for residents.
Cost of Living
Amsterdam carries elevated rent and services costs, partly offset by cycling, transit, and broad public-service quality. Cost of Living in Amsterdam scores 60/100, placing it in the developing group of the indexed set.
Affordability, essential costs, and day-to-day financial pressure for residents.
60/100
Mid-tier affordability with strong service and mobility offsets.
High
Central demand and limited supply keep rental markets competitive.
Very strong
Cycling and transit access reduce private-vehicle costs for most households.
This HTML table mirrors the visible score cards so important comparison data is never trapped in a browser-only chart.
| Metric | Value | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Affordability score | 60/100 | Public infrastructure offsets some daily expense. |
| Housing pressure | High | Inner-canal districts remain especially competitive. |
| Mobility offset | Very strong | Car-light daily life is realistic across the metro. |
A crawlable comparison across a selection of same-country and top-scoring cities. The complete set is reachable via the rankings, the cities index, and each city profile.
| City | Score | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Amsterdam (this page) | 60/100 | Amsterdam carries elevated rent and services costs, partly offset by cycling, transit, and broad public-service quality. |
| Enschede | 70/100 | Enschede's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies. |
| Rotterdam | 70/100 | Rotterdam's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies. |
| Utrecht | 70/100 | Utrecht's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies. |
| Eindhoven | 70/100 | Eindhoven's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies. |
| Groningen | 68/100 | Groningen's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies. |
| Maastricht | 68/100 | Maastricht's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies. |
| 's-Hertogenbosch | 67/100 | 's-Hertogenbosch's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies. |
| The Hague | 66/100 | The Hague's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies. |
| Almere | 65/100 | Almere's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies. |
| Lelystad | 62/100 | Lelystad's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies. |
| Roermond | 60/100 | Roermond's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies. |
| Leeuwarden | 60/100 | Leeuwarden's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies. |
| Venlo | 58/100 | Venlo's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies. |
| Ede | 54/100 | Ede's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies. |
| Dordrecht | 53/100 | Dordrecht's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies. |
| Apeldoorn | 53/100 | Apeldoorn's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies. |
| Alphen aan den Rijn | 52/100 | Alphen aan den Rijn's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies. |
| Hengelo | 52/100 | Hengelo's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies. |
| Westland | 51/100 | Westland's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies. |
| Zoetermeer | 50/100 | Zoetermeer's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies. |
| Amersfoort | 50/100 | Amersfoort's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies. |
| Tilburg | 50/100 | Tilburg's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies. |
| Breda | 50/100 | Breda's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies. |
| Leiden | 50/100 | Leiden's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies. |
| Delft | 50/100 | Delft's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies. |
| Nijmegen | 50/100 | Nijmegen's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies. |
| Haarlem | 50/100 | Haarlem's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies. |
| Arnhem | 50/100 | Arnhem's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies. |
| Zwolle | 50/100 | Zwolle's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies. |
| Hilversum | 49/100 | Hilversum's cost-of-living profile is a directional indicator pending integration of verified city-level data; structured benchmark context applies. |
The cost-of-living model weighs essential spending against mobility and service offsets. Amsterdam's transit and cycling infrastructure reduces several recurring household costs. Across the indexed cities the cost of living average is 63/100, so Amsterdam is 3 points below the median. Data year 2025; last updated 2026-05-16. Drawn from 3 institutional references.
Read this module with the main open the amsterdam city profile and the read the scoring methodology page so single-topic pages do not hide tradeoffs across dimensions.
Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation. Verified datasets are being integrated; official sources should be used for critical decisions.
3 institutional references inform this view, listed below with reliability notes. Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation; verified datasets are being integrated and official sources should be used for critical decisions.
Used as a policy and methodology reference for urban exposure and resilience signals.
Used to explain urban climate vulnerability and adaptation scoring logic.
Used for directional affordability framing alongside official housing and price datasets.
These links connect module pages back to city, ranking, and sibling topic paths with crawlable href values.
Return to the complete Amsterdam profile with all module scores and source context.
Health-oriented air-quality conditions with context from WHO, EEA, and EPA benchmarks.
Clean-energy readiness, grid resilience, and solar or efficiency opportunity signals.
Personal safety, institutional trust, and resilience signals informed by international safety and crime data.
Broadband and mobile connectivity quality, latency, and digital-readiness signals for residents and remote workers.
Climate exposure, hazard frequency, and adaptation context for floods, heat, storms, and wildfires.
A balanced ranking of cities across affordability, air quality, clean-energy readiness, and resilience.
Cities that combine strong services, mobility, safety, clean air, and resilience into a healthy day-to-day profile.