Global CityIntelligence

Climate Risk

Climate Risk in Los Angeles

Los Angeles carries meaningful climate exposure from heat, drought, wildfire, and coastal pressure, balanced by active state-level adaptation. Climate Risk in Los Angeles scores 64/100, placing it in the developing group of the indexed set.

Last updated
2026-05-16
Data year
2025
Module score
64/100

Climate Risk score

Climate exposure, hazard frequency, and adaptation context for floods, heat, storms, and wildfires.

Climate Risk in Los Angeles64/100

Primary hazard

Heat and wildfire

Rising heat and wildfire are the main hazards.

Flood exposure

Moderate

Surface and coastal flood pressure rises in storm cycles.

Adaptation capacity

Strong

State and city programs support resilience.

Los Angeles climate risk data table

This HTML table mirrors the visible score cards so important comparison data is never trapped in a browser-only chart.

Los Angeles Climate Risk data table
MetricValueContext
Primary hazardHeat and wildfireDrought cycles raise long-run pressure.
Flood exposureModerateDrainage programs are central.
Adaptation capacityStrongImplementation timelines extend into the medium term.

Climate Risk city comparison

A crawlable comparison across a selection of same-country and top-scoring cities. The complete set is reachable via the rankings, the cities index, and each city profile.

Climate Risk city comparison table
CityScoreSummary
Los Angeles (this page)64/100Los Angeles carries meaningful climate exposure from heat, drought, wildfire, and coastal pressure, balanced by active state-level adaptation.
Chicago76/100Chicago carries moderate climate exposure from heat, intense rainfall, and lakefront stormwater pressure, balanced by active adaptation.
Seattle76/100Seattle faces moderate climate exposure from heat, atmospheric-river rainfall, and seasonal wildfire smoke, balanced by active adaptation.
Washington DC76/100Washington DC's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity.
Plano76/100Plano's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity.
Scottsdale76/100Scottsdale's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity.
Laredo76/100Laredo's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity.
Fremont76/100Fremont's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity.
Conroe76/100Conroe's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity.
Boston75/100Boston's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity.
Chula Vista75/100Chula Vista's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity.
Glendale75/100Glendale's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity.
Bloomington75/100Bloomington's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity.
Minneapolis74/100Minneapolis's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity.
Madison74/100Madison's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity.
North Las Vegas74/100North Las Vegas's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity.
Santa Clarita74/100Santa Clarita's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity.
Santa Ana73/100Santa Ana's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity.
Irvine73/100Irvine's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity.
Philadelphia72/100Philadelphia's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity.
Denver72/100Denver's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity.
San Diego72/100San Diego's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity.
Portland72/100Portland's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity.
Raleigh72/100Raleigh's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity.
Pittsburgh72/100Pittsburgh's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity.
Gilbert72/100Gilbert's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity.
Chandler71/100Chandler's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity.
Irving71/100Irving's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity.
Oyster Bay71/100Oyster Bay's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity.
Nashville70/100Nashville's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity.
Charlotte70/100Charlotte's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity.

Interpretation

Climate-risk scoring weighs hazard exposure with adaptation capacity. Los Angeles' hazards are concurrent and require sustained investment. Across the indexed cities the climate risk average is 62/100, so Los Angeles is close to the median for this dimension. Data year 2025; last updated 2026-05-16. Drawn from 3 institutional references.

Read this module with the main open the los angeles city profile and the read the scoring methodology page so single-topic pages do not hide tradeoffs across dimensions.

Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation. Verified datasets are being integrated; official sources should be used for critical decisions.

Sources

3 institutional references inform this view, listed below with reliability notes. Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation; verified datasets are being integrated and official sources should be used for critical decisions.

Continue exploring

These links connect module pages back to city, ranking, and sibling topic paths with crawlable href values.

Energy in Los Angeles

Clean-energy readiness, grid resilience, and solar or efficiency opportunity signals.

Safety in Los Angeles

Personal safety, institutional trust, and resilience signals informed by international safety and crime data.

Overall Intelligence

A balanced ranking of cities across affordability, air quality, clean-energy readiness, and resilience.

Quality of Life

Cities that combine strong services, mobility, safety, clean air, and resilience into a healthy day-to-day profile.