Module profile
Climate Risk score
64/100
Climate exposure, hazard frequency, and adaptation context for floods, heat, storms, and wildfires.
Climate Risk in Los Angeles64/100
Climate Risk
Climate Risk in Los Angeles
Los Angeles carries meaningful climate exposure from heat, drought, wildfire, and coastal pressure, balanced by active state-level adaptation. Climate Risk in Los Angeles scores 64/100, placing it in the developing group of the indexed set.
- Last updated
- 2026-05-16
- Data year
- 2025
- Module score
- 64/100
Primary hazard
Heat and wildfire
Rising heat and wildfire are the main hazards.
Flood exposure
Moderate
Surface and coastal flood pressure rises in storm cycles.
Adaptation capacity
Strong
State and city programs support resilience.
Los Angeles climate risk data table
This HTML table mirrors the visible score cards so important comparison data is never trapped in a browser-only chart.
| Metric | Value | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Primary hazard | Heat and wildfire | Drought cycles raise long-run pressure. |
| Flood exposure | Moderate | Drainage programs are central. |
| Adaptation capacity | Strong | Implementation timelines extend into the medium term. |
Climate Risk city comparison
A crawlable comparison across a selection of same-country and top-scoring cities. The complete set is reachable via the rankings, the cities index, and each city profile.
| City | Score | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Los Angeles (this page) | 64/100 | Los Angeles carries meaningful climate exposure from heat, drought, wildfire, and coastal pressure, balanced by active state-level adaptation. |
| Chicago | 76/100 | Chicago carries moderate climate exposure from heat, intense rainfall, and lakefront stormwater pressure, balanced by active adaptation. |
| Seattle | 76/100 | Seattle faces moderate climate exposure from heat, atmospheric-river rainfall, and seasonal wildfire smoke, balanced by active adaptation. |
| Washington DC | 76/100 | Washington DC's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Plano | 76/100 | Plano's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Scottsdale | 76/100 | Scottsdale's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Laredo | 76/100 | Laredo's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Fremont | 76/100 | Fremont's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Conroe | 76/100 | Conroe's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Ramapo | 76/100 | Ramapo's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Torrance | 76/100 | Torrance's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Surprise | 76/100 | Surprise's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Olathe | 76/100 | Olathe's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Miramar | 76/100 | Miramar's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Thousand Oaks | 76/100 | Thousand Oaks's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Simi Valley | 76/100 | Simi Valley's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Richardson | 76/100 | Richardson's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Meridian | 76/100 | Meridian's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Carlsbad | 76/100 | Carlsbad's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Gresham | 76/100 | Gresham's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Olympia | 76/100 | Olympia's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Vancouver | 76/100 | Vancouver's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Joliet | 76/100 | Joliet's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Utica | 76/100 | Utica's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Huntington Beach | 76/100 | Huntington Beach's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Lancaster | 76/100 | Lancaster's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Canton | 76/100 | Canton's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Redding | 76/100 | Redding's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| White Plains | 76/100 | White Plains's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Bellevue | 76/100 | Bellevue's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Casper | 76/100 | Casper's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
Interpretation
Climate-risk scoring weighs hazard exposure with adaptation capacity. Los Angeles' hazards are concurrent and require sustained investment. Across the indexed cities the climate risk average is 69/100, so Los Angeles is 5 points below the median. Data year 2025; last updated 2026-05-16. Drawn from 3 institutional references.
Read this module with the main open the los angeles city profile and the read the scoring methodology page so single-topic pages do not hide tradeoffs across dimensions.
Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation. Verified datasets are being integrated; official sources should be used for critical decisions.
Sources
3 institutional references inform this view, listed below with reliability notes. Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation; verified datasets are being integrated and official sources should be used for critical decisions.
- IPCC: AR6 WGII Chapter 6: Cities, settlements and key infrastructure
Used to explain urban climate vulnerability and adaptation scoring logic.
- NASA: NASA POWER
Used as an energy-resource and weather-normalization reference.
- UN-Habitat: World Cities Report 2024
Used as a policy and methodology reference for urban exposure and resilience signals.
Continue exploring
These links connect module pages back to city, ranking, and sibling topic paths with crawlable href values.
Los Angeles city profile
Return to the complete Los Angeles profile with all module scores and source context.
Cost of Living in Los Angeles
Affordability, essential costs, and day-to-day financial pressure for residents.
Air Quality in Los Angeles
Health-oriented air-quality conditions with context from WHO, EEA, and EPA benchmarks.
Energy in Los Angeles
Clean-energy readiness, grid resilience, and solar or efficiency opportunity signals.
Safety in Los Angeles
Personal safety, institutional trust, and resilience signals informed by international safety and crime data.
Internet Speed in Los Angeles
Broadband and mobile connectivity quality, latency, and digital-readiness signals for residents and remote workers.
Overall Intelligence
A balanced ranking of cities across affordability, air quality, clean-energy readiness, and resilience.
Quality of Life
Cities that combine strong services, mobility, safety, clean air, and resilience into a healthy day-to-day profile.