Climate Risk score
Climate exposure, hazard frequency, and adaptation context for floods, heat, storms, and wildfires.
Climate Risk
Zurich's climate-risk profile is comparatively low, shaped mainly by heat waves and Alpine-runoff variability. Climate Risk in Zurich scores 80/100, placing it in the strong group of the indexed set.
Climate exposure, hazard frequency, and adaptation context for floods, heat, storms, and wildfires.
Heat and runoff
Heat and Alpine-runoff variability are the main long-run hazards.
Moderate
Lake and river flood scenarios require ongoing investment.
Very strong
Long-term climate plans and engineering capacity build resilience.
This HTML table mirrors the visible score cards so important comparison data is never trapped in a browser-only chart.
| Metric | Value | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Primary hazard | Heat and runoff | Glacier change is a regional planning input. |
| Flood exposure | Moderate | Localized flooding events are managed actively. |
| Adaptation capacity | Very strong | Implementation depth raises the score significantly. |
A crawlable comparison across a selection of same-country and top-scoring cities. The complete set is reachable via the rankings, the cities index, and each city profile.
| City | Score | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Zurich (this page) | 80/100 | Zurich's climate-risk profile is comparatively low, shaped mainly by heat waves and Alpine-runoff variability. |
| Geneva | 86/100 | Geneva's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Basel | 84/100 | Basel's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Neuchâtel | 82/100 | Neuchâtel's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Bern | 81/100 | Bern's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Lausanne | 80/100 | Lausanne's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Lucerne | 79/100 | Lucerne's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Biel/Bienne | 79/100 | Biel/Bienne's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Winterthur | 78/100 | Winterthur's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| St. Gallen | 77/100 | St. Gallen's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Lugano | 76/100 | Lugano's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Vejle | 84/100 | Vejle's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Oslo | 84/100 | Oslo carries moderate climate risk centered on heavy precipitation and stormwater pressure, with strong adaptation planning. |
| Nanterre | 84/100 | Nanterre's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Vitry-sur-Seine | 84/100 | Vitry-sur-Seine's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Créteil | 84/100 | Créteil's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Vlaardingen | 84/100 | Vlaardingen's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Sandnes | 84/100 | Sandnes's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Blois | 84/100 | Blois's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Nyköping | 84/100 | Nyköping's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Hagen | 83/100 | Hagen's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Boulogne-Billancourt | 83/100 | Boulogne-Billancourt's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Bottrop | 83/100 | Bottrop's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Hengelo | 83/100 | Hengelo's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Roosendaal | 83/100 | Roosendaal's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Steyr | 83/100 | Steyr's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Cholet | 83/100 | Cholet's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Lustenau | 83/100 | Lustenau's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Frederiksberg | 82/100 | Frederiksberg's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Helsinki | 82/100 | Helsinki carries moderate climate risk centered on coastal storm exposure and stormwater pressure, with steady adaptation planning. |
| Munich | 82/100 | Munich carries moderate climate risk centered on river flooding and rising summer heat. |
Climate-risk scoring weighs hazard exposure with adaptation capacity. Zurich's hazards are limited; institutional capacity supports a strong score. Across the indexed cities the climate risk average is 62/100, so Zurich is 18 points above the median. Data year 2025; last updated 2026-05-16. Drawn from 3 institutional references.
Read this module with the main open the zurich city profile and the read the scoring methodology page so single-topic pages do not hide tradeoffs across dimensions.
Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation. Verified datasets are being integrated; official sources should be used for critical decisions.
3 institutional references inform this view, listed below with reliability notes. Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation; verified datasets are being integrated and official sources should be used for critical decisions.
Used to explain urban climate vulnerability and adaptation scoring logic.
Used as an energy-resource and weather-normalization reference.
Used as a policy and methodology reference for urban exposure and resilience signals.
These links connect module pages back to city, ranking, and sibling topic paths with crawlable href values.
Return to the complete Zurich profile with all module scores and source context.
Affordability, essential costs, and day-to-day financial pressure for residents.
Health-oriented air-quality conditions with context from WHO, EEA, and EPA benchmarks.
Clean-energy readiness, grid resilience, and solar or efficiency opportunity signals.
Personal safety, institutional trust, and resilience signals informed by international safety and crime data.
Broadband and mobile connectivity quality, latency, and digital-readiness signals for residents and remote workers.
A balanced ranking of cities across affordability, air quality, clean-energy readiness, and resilience.
Cities that combine strong services, mobility, safety, clean air, and resilience into a healthy day-to-day profile.