Climate Risk score
Climate exposure, hazard frequency, and adaptation context for floods, heat, storms, and wildfires.
Climate Risk
Mexico City faces meaningful climate exposure centered on water scarcity, subsidence, and rising heat, balanced by long-running adaptation programs. Climate Risk in Mexico City scores 62/100, placing it in the developing group of the indexed set.
Climate exposure, hazard frequency, and adaptation context for floods, heat, storms, and wildfires.
Water and heat
Water scarcity and rising heat are the main hazards.
Moderate
Surface flooding pressure rises in the rainy season.
Improving
Climate plans and water programs build resilience.
This HTML table mirrors the visible score cards so important comparison data is never trapped in a browser-only chart.
| Metric | Value | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Primary hazard | Water and heat | Subsidence raises long-run infrastructure pressure. |
| Flood exposure | Moderate | Drainage programs are central. |
| Adaptation capacity | Improving | Implementation timelines extend into the medium term. |
A crawlable comparison across a selection of same-country and top-scoring cities. The complete set is reachable via the rankings, the cities index, and each city profile.
| City | Score | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico City (this page) | 62/100 | Mexico City faces meaningful climate exposure centered on water scarcity, subsidence, and rising heat, balanced by long-running adaptation programs. |
| Guadalajara | 68/100 | Guadalajara's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Monterrey | 64/100 | Monterrey's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Geneva | 86/100 | Geneva's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Vejle | 84/100 | Vejle's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Oslo | 84/100 | Oslo carries moderate climate risk centered on heavy precipitation and stormwater pressure, with strong adaptation planning. |
| Basel | 84/100 | Basel's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Nanterre | 84/100 | Nanterre's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Vitry-sur-Seine | 84/100 | Vitry-sur-Seine's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Créteil | 84/100 | Créteil's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Vlaardingen | 84/100 | Vlaardingen's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Sandnes | 84/100 | Sandnes's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Blois | 84/100 | Blois's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Nyköping | 84/100 | Nyköping's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Hagen | 83/100 | Hagen's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Boulogne-Billancourt | 83/100 | Boulogne-Billancourt's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Bottrop | 83/100 | Bottrop's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Hengelo | 83/100 | Hengelo's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Roosendaal | 83/100 | Roosendaal's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Steyr | 83/100 | Steyr's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Cholet | 83/100 | Cholet's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Lustenau | 83/100 | Lustenau's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Frederiksberg | 82/100 | Frederiksberg's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Helsinki | 82/100 | Helsinki carries moderate climate risk centered on coastal storm exposure and stormwater pressure, with steady adaptation planning. |
| Munich | 82/100 | Munich carries moderate climate risk centered on river flooding and rising summer heat. |
| Aarhus | 82/100 | Aarhus's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Remscheid | 82/100 | Remscheid's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Roubaix | 82/100 | Roubaix's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Hanau | 82/100 | Hanau's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Krems | 82/100 | Krems's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
| Neuchâtel | 82/100 | Neuchâtel's climate-risk profile is a directional indicator combining regional hazard categories with national adaptation capacity. |
Climate-risk scoring weighs hazard exposure with adaptation capacity. Mexico City's hazards are concurrent; institutional programs are scaling up. Across the indexed cities the climate risk average is 62/100, so Mexico City is close to the median for this dimension. Data year 2025; last updated 2026-05-16. Drawn from 3 institutional references.
Read this module with the main open the mexico city city profile and the read the scoring methodology page so single-topic pages do not hide tradeoffs across dimensions.
Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation. Verified datasets are being integrated; official sources should be used for critical decisions.
3 institutional references inform this view, listed below with reliability notes. Structured indicators on this page are directional and intended for orientation; verified datasets are being integrated and official sources should be used for critical decisions.
Used to explain urban climate vulnerability and adaptation scoring logic.
Used as an energy-resource and weather-normalization reference.
Used as a policy and methodology reference for urban exposure and resilience signals.
These links connect module pages back to city, ranking, and sibling topic paths with crawlable href values.
Return to the complete Mexico City profile with all module scores and source context.
Affordability, essential costs, and day-to-day financial pressure for residents.
Health-oriented air-quality conditions with context from WHO, EEA, and EPA benchmarks.
Clean-energy readiness, grid resilience, and solar or efficiency opportunity signals.
Personal safety, institutional trust, and resilience signals informed by international safety and crime data.
Broadband and mobile connectivity quality, latency, and digital-readiness signals for residents and remote workers.
A balanced ranking of cities across affordability, air quality, clean-energy readiness, and resilience.
Cities that combine strong services, mobility, safety, clean air, and resilience into a healthy day-to-day profile.